• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

FANNIE MAE Announcement

Status
Not open for further replies.
We used to be able to go to the FNMA site and readily find announcements similar to the one posted in this thread. I just spent close to an hour on their site and could not find this one or any others. Do anybody have a FNMA index page bookmarked that they can post here?
 
Thanks Dick,

That's the pages I was looking for. I guess if they were eSnakes I would have been eBit.
 
Frank:

It will be a Pilot Program for a short minute, but it will change overnight as more Lenders demand that FNMA make it available to them so they can maintain a competitive posture. Lenders want this program, and they will see that it's accelerated.

The part of the announcement where the Lender is not suppose to exert undo influence on the Appraiser to "hit the number" or omit defects in the Structure, has no meaning when the Appraiser fails to adhear to this unwritten policy and afterwards start to receive fewer and fewer assignments until he/she doesn't receive any.

The Lender dosen't have any responsibility to tell the Appraiser anything about not using him/her as an appraiser. If the Appraiser doesn't deliver the type of Report that the Lender needs to close his Loan, he wont use him/her in the future. The Lender is not obligated to use any specific Appraiser, he can use whomever he wants under this system.

As long as the Lender Control the work, he control the quality of the Appraisal Report, and that will not change until the Lender is removed from the Appraisal Process where he selects the Appraiser and makes the Assignments. This stuff ain't Rocket Science", and it is a No-Brainer.

leart3
 

Frank:

It will be a Pilot Program for a short minute, but it will change overnight as more Lenders demand that FNMA make it available to them so they can maintain a competitive posture. Lenders want this program, and they will see that it's accelerated.

The part of the announcement where the Lender is not suppose to exert undo influence on the Appraiser to "hit the number" or omit defects in the Structure, has no meaning when the Appraiser fails to adhear to this unwritten policy and afterwards start to receive fewer and fewer assignments until he/she doesn't receive any.

The Lender dosen't have any responsibility to tell the Appraiser anything about not using him/her as an appraiser. If the Appraiser doesn't deliver the type of Report that the Lender needs to close his Loan, he wont use him/her in the future. The Lender is not obligated to use any specific Appraiser, he can use whomever he wants under this system.

As long as the Lender Control the work, he control the quality of the Appraisal Report, and that will not change until the Lender is removed from the Appraisal Process where he selects the Appraiser and makes the Assignments. This stuff ain't Rocket Science", and it is a No-Brainer.

leart3

leart3,

Just wondering if you have always had such a positive outlook.

Lenders, with the exception of FHA Lenders under the old Fee Panel System and VA Lenders, have always had the right to use the appraiser they'd like. So what is new?

Fannie Mae Sellers have been responsible for the quality of the appraisals accompanying loans sold to Fannie Mae. So What is new?

There are a number of positive things in the Fannie Mae Announcement.

1. Referrals of unacceptable appraisal reports to state appraiser licensing or regulatory boards for any investigation and action. Do you agree this might help the industry enhance the quality of appraisals by identifying
and referring individual appraisers who appear to be unethical and/or incompetent?

2. Clarification of the 'Update - Recertification' issue. It is now painfully clear to the Lender these processes are an “update” of the original appraisal report and it should be completed by the original appraiser. It's clear these will not be done for free. Looks like opportunities to me, or do you disagree?

3. The statement 'The lender must take appropriate measures to assure that no actions -- such as pressuring appraisers to arrive at predetermined values and/or indicators of market condition -- taken by its employees, agents, or third-party originators compromise the warranties it makes to us' is a Black and White affirmation of what appraisers have been harping on for the last twenty four months. It this a positive statement we can use to the advantage of appraisers or do you view it as otherwise?

Is there anything in the Fannie Announcement you find advantageous?
 

Toast:

I don't get your point. FNMA has already waived the Standards when they created the $ 50 fee to replace the Appraisal Report. When FNMA created the $ 50 fee a few weeks ago to replace the Appraisal Report, there is no longer a requirement for a Report, so why would they have Standards for a (nonexistent) Report.

leart3 :twisted:

leart3,

I was being facetious. Having standards for a nonexistent report was my point.
 
Thank you for the link, printed it out and will take the info to our next appraiser's group meeting.

I think too many of us have "mis-read" what Fannie is doing with the appraisal waiver....it doesn't apply to all applications, only a small percentage will qualify.

It's funny, I get Fannie Mae liquidation appraisal assignments all the time, do you suppose they can waiver those???? LOL!
 

Thank you for the link, printed it out and will take the info to our next appraiser's group meeting.

I think too many of us have "mis-read" what Fannie is doing with the appraisal waiver....it doesn't apply to all applications, only a small percentage will qualify.

It's funny, I get Fannie Mae liquidation appraisal assignments all the time, do you suppose they can waiver those???? LOL!

Mike,

Ineteresting your should mention Fannie Mae Liquidation or REO Assignments. Here is a copy of a Letter to the Editor or the Florida Association of REALTORS Member's Only Website Published last week.


Letter to the Editor
Let's not repeat history
Re: Fannie Mae experiments with forgoing appraisals

Clearly, there are situations when an appraisal is overkill and should not be required. For instance, refinances, purchase money mortgages and equity loans less than 50% of the property's value. Value could be determined by tax assessment or Broker's Price Opinion. Many lenders have been taking advantage of their ability to forgo an appraisal considering the deminimus level of $250,000 for residential loans.

My concern is the loan/value ratio, the risk to a Federally Chartered Secondary Lender, the reliance on technology which is proprietary and untested by a volatile and uncertain market, and the resulting risk which might be absorbed by the Federal Government, hence, taxpayers. Although newspapers and Web sites are full of stories documenting cases of appraiser participation in providing appraisal reports for originating fraudulent loans, at least there is the requirement for an appraisal to independently offer an opinion of value and there is a mechanism in place to regulate the appraisal profession. There is no regulatory scheme in place or envisioned to discipline a machine. How long will it take for unscrupulous individuals to come up with methods to tweak the numbers and slip fraudulent loans through Fannie Mae's new program?

A recent news story in American Banker reports 60 to 80 percent of credit reports are now believed to have incorrect data, which can produce inaccurate scoring. If the credit reporting agencies cannot keep their databases clean, what does that say for the operators of the Automated Valuation Models? Errors in either direction will end up costing consumers and taxpayers much more than what is "saved" by not properly evaluating the security offered for a mortgage loan.

The general health of the GSEs is being questioned by some in the mortgage industry. Will this new program, and similar ones soon to follow, tend to weaken them more? What effect would that have on the availability of mortgage money and it's cost, as well as the housing market?

The appraisal is most likely the least expensive component of the mortgage loan procedure and might be one of the most important. The potential savings touted by Fannie Mae amount to a cheap night on the town. To this biased observed, it appears as though the effort is directed to remove an obstacle rather than provide a savings for the borrower.

Back in the eighties, Congress studied mortgage lending and appraisals as a result of the collapse of the thrift industry. Doesn't it make sense to learn from history, rather than repeat it?

Here is an excerpt from a congressional report written in the wake of the collapse of the Savings and Loan Industry in 1986.

"The real estate appraisal serves a variety of purposes, which affect investment choices, insurance decisions and regulatory activities, in addition to the primary area of loan origination. In the case of lending institution officials, it provides market information and other critically important data to support sound underwriting decisions on risk exposure, loan-to-value ratios, and maximum loan amounts. The appraisal also serves as an essential part of the process by which public (e.g., VA and FHA) and private sector mortgage insurers attempt to assure themselves of an, acceptable risk of loss. Similarly, and particularly in recent years that have seen tremendous growth in the secondary mortgage market and in the sale of mortgage-backed securities, the appraisal serves as one of the principle means buy which individual investors and institutions, (e.g., Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and thrifts) evaluate the quality of the loans they purchase. Finally, the appraisal serves as an important tool used by Federal and State regulators who supervise the Nation's financial institutions, to monitor loan portfolio quality both in terms of the institutions' overall soundness and the potential risk exposure to State and Federal (FDIC and FSLIC) insurance funds.

In short, accurate and reliable appraisals have come to serve new and increasingly important functions. They are essential, not only in the loan origination context, but in the broader realm of the public's perception of and confidence in the Nation's real estate finance and mortgage insurance and investment industries."

At any rate, every appraiser I know is busy as all get out. If Fannie starts taking these properties back, the first thing they'll do is order an appraisal to see what in the heck they own. There is plenty of business for appraisers other than loan originations. We appraisers just do not want
to see a repeat of the eighties.

Sincerely,

Francois (Frank) K. Gregoire IFA RAA
Gregoire & Gregoire, Inc.
St. Petersburg

p.s.

Formatting FIXED!
 
Verbalizing this new policy is one thing, and I hope FNMA really is going to report poor appraisals to state boards.

But....... it is up to state boards to put some teeth into USPAP enforcement.

So far, Arizona's Board has a weak enforcement history. Repeat offenders are allowed to continue appraising without any serious restriction.

Until repeat offenders are permanently booted out of the profession by their state boards, FNMA can turn in thousands of reports, and the pervasive practice of reporting requested values will continue without much change.

The lack of effective enforcement by state boards is a defacto repealment of USPAP.
 

Verbalizing this new policy is one thing, and I hope FNMA really is going to report poor appraisals to state boards.

But....... it is up to state boards to put some teeth into USPAP enforcement.

So far, Arizona's Board has a weak enforcement history. Repeat offenders are allowed to continue appraising without any serious restriction.


Ricardo,

Have read your views of the Arizona Board here and in other Forums for quite some time. Agree, without effective application of the tools available to State Regulatory Boards, the safeguards envisioned in the USPAP have no benefit to the public.

We learned yesterday that Fannie Mae is indeed referring cases to the Division of Real Estate and Florida Real Estate Appraisal Board, as is HUD. Those are making their way through the system.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top