prasercat
Senior Member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2007
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Colorado
It has been a very long day for me, and my brain is not functioning that well (although that can happen no matter how long the day!).
I still don't see the issue: House A has no basement and 3-beds. House B has a basement with an area that functions as a bedroom and has 2-beds for its above ground living area. Market values both homes as-if they were 3-bedrooms. Assuming there is no prohibition against valuing the basement area as "basement area" with its value equal to the 3rd bedroom, the market's reaction is appropriately reflected in the valuation analysis; further, since the market values the area equally as a 3-bedroom, I don't see any FO as well.
Again, I may be too tired to grasp the significant issue (so I'll follow the discussion as an observer... at least for tonight!).
The problem being, this is an FHA/HUD appraisal and HUD/FHA would not recognize the subject's bedroom in the basement as a bedroom, since it is non-conforming. If I treat the subject this way, then I need to treat the comps that way to be consistent in my methodolgy. However, it just so happens the subject has the required three in GLA, so it isn't a significant issue for the subject, but some of the comps will go from three bed homes to two bed homes if I do the same to them in the analysis..