Perhaps I did not make it clear that this is for an FHA loan, thus my understanding that HUD/FHA MPRs require a firewall between garages and living area. I thought that was evident by posting in this section, and it would seem that HUD/FHA requires appraisers to "require" that properties comply with the MPRs.
Hearsay? My very purpose in posting was to avoid speculation on how HUD/FHA MPRs would apply here, as I've failed to find specific direction in my search of HUD/FHA sources, and I've observed real expertise in the forum both in terms of knowledge and links to authoritative sources.
In conventional appraising, I typically avoid requiring anything code-wise, what to speak of applying current "code" to a house built in 1950. I am simply seeking assistance determining how the HUD/FHA MPRs for firewalls between garages and living areas apply to this situation.
I can't see any way to avoid calling for the firewall if the large opening remains, allowing someone to park a vehicle inside, based on fire and carbon-monoxide issues. To complicate matters, although the dwelling is heated by electric baseboard units in each room, there is an old wood-burning furnace in the basement, with ducting to all rooms-- even rarer in these parts! Although it likely has not been used in decades, it looks fully connected/functional.
Gratitude in advance for authoritative info and informed opinions.
Just because there is a door wide enough to drive a car through does not make it a garage.
By definition a garage is a structure or building to park or store an automobile. If it does not qualify as a garage, it may just be a walkout basement with a wide door.
I might appraise it as a full basement and give no value as a garage and make a comment stating it has a 9' door and the tax records indicate it is a garage but it does not meet the safety requirements of a garage.
I'd love to take your word for it, with you being Certified General and a moderator (no offense), but I've read too many Forum threads wherein experienced, qualified appraisers adamantly disagreed with one another over HUD/FHA MPRs and Fannie/Freddie guidelines. My research of previous threads for this inquiry found dozens of posts by experienced FHA appraisers stating emphatically that there must be drywall/firewall between any garages and living areas, thus my confusion. We are a tribe predisposed to eat our own before assisting our brethren with authoritative source data.
My personal experience has been that underwriters categorically require the specific repairs cited by the appraisers, nothing more, nothing less, and defer to the appraiser for interpretation/application of the HUD/FHA MPRs. It is also my experience that parties to the sale routinely ask the appraiser for the simplest way to make a property comply, which is why I mentioned the idea of replacing the vehicle door with a man-door.
Regarding local "codes" trumping HUD/FHA MPRs, I disagree. My county does not require that manufactured homes have tie-downs. But I've seen dozens of manufactured homes of all ages have them installed as part of an FHA loan, based on the Engineer's Report and underwriting requirements.
I'd be surprised, if relieved, to see a consensus of appraisers stating that HUD/FHA does not require any firewall protection between attached garages and living areas, so let us see if that manifests here in the days ahead.
Not for nothing, but,
If your home was built in the 1950s, you may have a hard time explaining how it had a garage for 60 years until you came to appraise it, if that is what is reflected in the tax records.
I believe your thoughts are good in finding cost to cure that is economically feasible, but those tax records are the thing that's going to hang you down the road.
is it possible that it had a partition wall in the past, between the basement and garage area, which has been removed? If so you could recommend a change be made to the tax records to remove the garage from the tax records.
.
This inquiry may seem redundant, based on a recent thread about a garage needing a "ceiling", or self-evident, but I need specific advice. While I routinely call for drywall/firewalls to be installed on the wall between an attached garage and a dwelling, we see so few basements here in Oregon-- and fewer basement garages-- I've yet to encounter the following set-up.
The subject: Single level 1950s Rambler measuring approximately 24' x 50'. Due to its mildly sloping parcel, three of the sides are bermed/ground level, with the north side cut away with retaining walls to accommodate a 24' x 29' basement under approximately 3/5 of the dwelling. The basement is entirely open with no partitions. Walls are poured concrete, and ceiling is open wood joists and exposed wood-plank subfloor of the first level floor. The basement is accessed via a typical interior stairway from the main level, and via a 9' wide basement wall opening which is covered by a horizontally sliding "garage" door. The assessor's records correctly cite the basement area as 667sf, and reference the "Basement garage" as 230 sf (of the 667sf). This would assign it a theoretical 10' width by the 23' depth, despite the lack of partition walls.
My experience and gut tell me that there must be drywall installed on the ceiling, and possibly a dividing firewall with fire-rated door enclosing the garage portion. I expect that the parties involved in the sale are going to object when informed of that, because there is so much heat ducting and exposed plumbing/wiring/mechanical in the ceiling that drywall installation will be complicated, so I will likely need authoritative references.
I read an old thread which described a similar scenario, wherein the OP proposed a second option of walling in the vehicle opening and reducing the access to a "man-door", which is a cheaper option, and negates the need for the extensive drywall. Contributors to that thread berated the OP for over-stepping his role, but my experience is that the agents/sellers/buyers in these situations want the appraiser to call for the cheapest, fastest fix so the property can qualify and close escrow. In this case, because the existing garage door is a barn-type wooden sliding door, replacing it is probably the simplest, cheapest option.
I can't see any way to avoid calling for the firewall if the large opening remains, allowing someone to park a vehicle inside, based on fire and carbon-monoxide issues. To complicate matters, although the dwelling is heated by electric baseboard units in each room, there is an old wood-burning furnace in the basement, with ducting to all rooms-- even rarer in these parts! Although it likely has not been used in decades, it looks fully connected/functional.
Gratitude in advance for authoritative info and informed opinions.
Recommending the owner eliminate his garage sounds like going in the wrong direction in value/functionality.