23Degrees
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2004
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- California
I would not touch this if an "as is" report was required. That being said, if you are not bound by FHA guidelines and you are willing to proceed "as is" I have some thoughts that at least in part are due to my recent visit to the DeSaix University of "cost to cure" in a recent thread:
Do not come to the "as is" value by applying a cost to cure within the market grid that is based on a cost estimate. If the lender requires a cost to cure (hopefully you are being adequately compensated to determine this) then by all means, include it within the report, but not in the sales grid where the adjustments are being based on market effect, not cost. What you need to determine is the market effect of the flooded basement and related damage and adjust within the grid for it. You indicate you might have some comparables with a similar condition. This sounds like a lucky and good start. You might want to consider locating and contacting agents in the area who have dealt with this issue and ask them for their read on gauging market effect from this condition. Perhaps your MLS will let you screen for terms like "flooded" thru the years and you can develop a market effect based on historical data as well.
While I sit back and see if I get a passing grade on that I will say that if you do proceed "as is" give full consideration to any potential liability you could acquire if your cost estimates turn out to be way off or your determination of market effect was underestimated based on the actual condition of the home once the water was removed and everyone gets to see the bottom.
Do not come to the "as is" value by applying a cost to cure within the market grid that is based on a cost estimate. If the lender requires a cost to cure (hopefully you are being adequately compensated to determine this) then by all means, include it within the report, but not in the sales grid where the adjustments are being based on market effect, not cost. What you need to determine is the market effect of the flooded basement and related damage and adjust within the grid for it. You indicate you might have some comparables with a similar condition. This sounds like a lucky and good start. You might want to consider locating and contacting agents in the area who have dealt with this issue and ask them for their read on gauging market effect from this condition. Perhaps your MLS will let you screen for terms like "flooded" thru the years and you can develop a market effect based on historical data as well.
While I sit back and see if I get a passing grade on that I will say that if you do proceed "as is" give full consideration to any potential liability you could acquire if your cost estimates turn out to be way off or your determination of market effect was underestimated based on the actual condition of the home once the water was removed and everyone gets to see the bottom.