I was involved in a case once to appraise a warehouse that had collapsed and the owner claimed it was due to wind damage suffered as a result of a big thunderstorm. This was a case about insurance coverage for specific types of damages. If the wind caused the damage, it was covered by the insurance. If something else caused the damage, it was not covered. I inspected the property with the lawyer for the insurance company. It was obvious that wind had nothing to do with the collapse. The wall collapsed on a side where dirt was pilled against the wall up to a depth of about four feet and shielded from the wind. I also found a history in the property of sinking foundations and support pilasters.
I told the lawyer he needed a soil engineer because this problem had something to do with the soil. I learned some interesting things as a result of this case. As it turned out, the soil engineer determined that the wall collapsed, not because of the wind that resulted from the storm, but from the pressure caused by the rain in the storm when the soil got wet. If you pile dry dirt against a foundation wall it will have X amount of pressure per sf against the wall. But if the dirt gets wet, the pressure will increase on the order of “40 to 50” times the pressure of dry dirt. So 50 pounds of pressure can quickly become 2,000 pounds of pressure.
This was a case scheduled for Federal Court and I was qualified as an expert witness. The judge looked at the evidence and threw it out of court. A couple of weeks later the lawyer that hired me sent me a copy of a letter he had received from the Federal Judge. The judge stated in the letter that no cases would be heard in his court without scientific supporting data. No more: “Based on my 30 years of experience in the field.” That was another reason I started using regression methods.
Something else that came up was the definition of market value in the insurance policy: “Actual cash value.” After much research between the lawyer and me, we figured out that the definition hinged on what the lawyers called the “Broad Evidence Rule.” This is something you may want to file away for future reference. Actual cash value means under the Broad Evidence Rule means that anything you find out in any time frame about the property can be used as evidence. For example, a building collapses and you discover the cause and the cause could not have been discovered unless the building had collapsed, then you can use it as evidence. Basically anything you can found out that influences property price in any time frame can be used.
The next case I got involved in was a restaurant that burned down. I used the Broad Evidence Rule based on the history of the property. It was a 19th Century Rail Road station converted to a theme restaurant. I showed the original purchase price, the operating history, a recent sale of the business and fixtures, and a lease of the real estate to the purchasers of the business. This was an obvious scam operation set up to defraud the insurance company. So, if you are ever called upon to do an appraisal for an insurance claim, or any claim for that matter, the first thing you had better do is get a clear definition of market value and be aware of the Broad Evidence Rule. I think the Broad Evidence Rule only applies in Federal Court.