Airstream
Junior Member
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2022
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Wisconsin
I have had many similar situations on lakefront properties. It's not always easy to determine exactly if one should tear it down or renew what is there. Let me give you a couple of examples:
1) I did an appraisal of a brick house that had been updated and had not functional obsolescence. The architecture was a bit different, but it was all in good shape. I appraised it for an estate, and I thought it should be worth about $750,000 "as is." They listed it for nearly a million. I continued to watch to see what would happen. It was on the market a very long time and after dropping the price numerous times it finally sold for $560,000. I was shocked, because that is what the site value. I called the agent and asked what occurred and he said, "No one liked the style of the house. They bought it for the lot and are tearing it down."
2) On another situation a property sold with a very old house on it that was a mess. The site was worth over a million and had a very nice pier. I used it to kind of determine a site value on another property and figured they would tear the house down and rebuild on it. Well lo and behold they remodeled the house. I was shocked. The guy next door bought the property and remade the present house in to a pool house, and he built a big pool in front of it.
I only bring this up because it is often hard to determine what is and what is not a tear down based upon external obsolescence or HBU. You can only make a judgment, and then do so with a great deal of humility.
1) I did an appraisal of a brick house that had been updated and had not functional obsolescence. The architecture was a bit different, but it was all in good shape. I appraised it for an estate, and I thought it should be worth about $750,000 "as is." They listed it for nearly a million. I continued to watch to see what would happen. It was on the market a very long time and after dropping the price numerous times it finally sold for $560,000. I was shocked, because that is what the site value. I called the agent and asked what occurred and he said, "No one liked the style of the house. They bought it for the lot and are tearing it down."
2) On another situation a property sold with a very old house on it that was a mess. The site was worth over a million and had a very nice pier. I used it to kind of determine a site value on another property and figured they would tear the house down and rebuild on it. Well lo and behold they remodeled the house. I was shocked. The guy next door bought the property and remade the present house in to a pool house, and he built a big pool in front of it.
I only bring this up because it is often hard to determine what is and what is not a tear down based upon external obsolescence or HBU. You can only make a judgment, and then do so with a great deal of humility.
