djd09
Elite Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2009
- Professional Status
- Licensed Appraiser
- State
- Ohio
think we can foia the data?


Ultimately to the detriment of the taxpayer. That's why they had regulations. But since no one has needed a new bailout, let's throw all those safeguards out. Anything goes. The S & L Crisis showed us the incompetence that was allowed to operate banks. Famously Jim McDougall- Friend of Bill- testified that he honestly didn't know what he was doing when lending huge sums of money out of a tiny S & L and bank up in the Ozarks as if he couldn't see any risk to lending that money to Little Rock speculators. And when the Great Recession hit, Alan Greenspan was shocked, yes shocked, that banks didn't look out for their own interests by clamping down on risk. And once again, the next crisis, someone will act as if they cannot imagine how this could happen...completely surprised in one hand and the other out for Fed money, and once again the taxpayer bites the big enchilada.their regulators are allowing them to use those alternatives
That's always what it comes down to, offloading the risks to the public whilst retaining the profits. When the govt allows this it amounts to one of the most significant moral hazards imaginable.
Another good reason that F/F should be abolished. The lenders should carry the risk on their books, at their expense and peril, and not at the taxpayer's peril.
It's not about what those doing the grunt work earn. It is about the profits and compensation to the CEO's top management/share holders - in a capitalist's system they are allowed to earn obscener profits, but when it is earned at my expense due to a govt entitlement to them via a split of the bundled appraisal fee, I have a problem with that.
think we can foia the data?![]()
![]()
![]()