But getting back to the economic ramifications, our society already sends more women to college than men. How does that play out over the long term?
Women are conditioned to "marry up" in terms of resources
Women have a more finite period during their lives when they can safely bear children
May we be looking at a situation where younger guys are deciding in advance that they're not interested in engaging in the big struggle to raise a family? If you don't intent to raise kids then you won't experience as strongly the urge to make the sacrifices to get the big job, spend most or all of your waking hours working or commuting to that job, trying to balance the demands on your time a family needs, and then run the risk of losing it all anyway when your wife decides to initiate a divorce because she's unhappy.
Supposedly, when unmarried couples break up men are just as likely as women to initiate that, but when marriages break up 70% of those are initiated by the woman.
Anyways, a guy not planning on kids or marriage has less incentive to go to college, less incentive to buy the house, less incentive to make sacrifices to get ahead at work, and isn't on the hook for child support. After a while and extending the current trends the economics of that might add up.
Then when these guys have no kids to take care of them in their old age those efforts devolve to the state.