If an appraiser's reporting on the 1025 form, that person's got to be consistent with the definition of gross building area (GBA) pre-printed on that form. Either that, or they have to be sure to disclose in the report what it is that they did do.
Here's an example. There's a two-unit building, one unit is below grade in a high "English" style basement. What do you do with the GBA on that? I include the basement as GBA. In the cost approach, I'll treat it as finished basement area. In the sales comparison analysis, I'll include it in GBA, but I'll also insert a not in the basement section, indicating that this area is included in GBA. What would you do?
Some of the two- to four-unit buildings in the Chicago area present other types of problems. City occupancy permits indicate the number of legal units. If a property has an illegal basement unit, do you include that in GBA? Doing so forces the question of unit's legality. Also, our county records of the property's size can be (contrary to opinions I've heard) fairly accurate, but it depends on whether they include the basement finished area or not. If the property is a two-story two-unit with an unfinished basement, they sometimes don't. If the property is a three-unit with one in the basement, sometimes they do.