Good link Les:
I'd like to pin-point these these consecutive quotes from your link as worthy of further thought:
The Countrywide chairman said it is "meaningless" to require targeted borrowers to come to the closing table with as much as 10 percent of the purchase price in cash, especially since much of money comes from a relative or some other third party.
I don't care who it comes from: I personally think that SOME (not neccesarily 10%) quantity ought to come from some place: Friends and family tend to put a bit more responsibility on the back of the borrower than their signature on a bank loan anyway.
"It's often not their money anyway, yet we put them through this torture," Mozilo said.
FINE! It causes the borrower to reach out and either be personally responsible OR have connections/obligation to someone they theoretically have a desire to continue the association with!
A downpayment "doesn't help the integrity of the loan at all," he added, explaining that troubled borrowers are often forced into foreclosure because it costs more to sell their places than they will lose in equity by handing the keys back to their lenders.
AHH you mean the realtors and other persons fees which often get lumped into the transaction 'market value'
It would seem to me that the system as it was with real appraisals with appraisers who were responsible and not quite as pressured to MAKE THE DEAL WORK, was in fact a fairly efficient system!
What HAS changed is the lack of face time from the 'responsible' appriasers with their clients...
Personal integrety and association is of far less import than speed and making the deal.
Step back and see where exactly the black hole in the system lies...
Appraisers for Consumer Education B)
it is time and past for impelmentation of a non-legislated return to ethics...
AI is no longer fulfilling that role, Naifa ditto,
can't legislate it. <_<
Hard to control it.
best clean up from within.
