Ok, let’s assume the subject is 4,400 sf GLA with another 1,100 sf of heated area that is not included in the GLA, not directly accessible from the living area. Let’s assume it also has a triple car garage, large porches, patios, balcony and is very good quality with a replacement cost of $428,000 on a 3 lot site, not included in the replacement cost above. Yes, this is a fairly new and likely the highest cost home in the county by far. Let’s assume a $370,000 contract price. The highest priced sale in the county was $250,000 ever, but it was within a year. As you can see the price of the subject is already discounted from the cost but is it enough of a discount in a market where the vast majority of annual sales are below $100,000? The economy of this very rural county is at best stable with a high unemployment rate, though that would hardly be a factor for this value home. Still, homes in the hundred thousands are appreciating due mostly to a limited market of transferring doctors and a few company execs. (There are only a handful of sales in the hundred thousands per year.) Yes, the size, quality, amenities and cost are definitely there.
The question again is is there a method or theory that would indicate a reasonable ceiling for a market above the highest sale price? I guess I am looking for something substantial to indicate a ceiling of 25% (or whatever) above the highest priced sale to use to discount this white elephant. Incidentally, it was on the market for 7 months in a typical 2-4 month market. Not as long as I would expect but stranger things have happened (possibly some bragging rights factor here). I am thinking it must be worth more than the highest priced sale since it has significantly more size, amenities, lot value, etc but how much more, $120,000 more? It’s worth the full contract price to the buyer at a 95% L/V but one sale is not a market and the buyers investment is not encouraging.
BTW, your comments are helpful. Thanks