• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

How are you handling "support your adjustments" revision requests?

Getting more of these lately where the reviewer wants paired sales or regression support for basically every line item on the grid.

got this exact stip from a new UW at a long term client like this is a manual robo (ask appraiser) comment they make. I sent the following and he closed the file

Sensitivity analysis (a standard, GSE-accepted Sales Comparison Adjustment Method documented in the report) was used (and its definition can be found under MARKET DATA/ADJUSMENT METHODS AT END OF REPORT) because it identifies the adjustments that produce the smallest range of adjusted sales prices. Quality adjustments specifically account for the subject’s all-brick (4 sides) construction versus brick-front/vinyl or all-vinyl. Minor lot-size differences received a $0 adjustment because no market-based evidence exists to support an adjustment for such small variances.

While bracketing is optimal and was utilized wherever possible, it is not a GSE or USPAP requirement for every data field. The report also notes that the appraiser had to go outside one mile to bracket certain aspects of the subject property, and the use of those comps does not render the opinion unreliable. Full adjustment rationale definitions and supporting market data are provided in the ‘MARKET DATA’ section at the end of the report.

Paired-sales analysis was not the primary method used, so no additional paired-sale data is provided (sensitivity analysis was employed instead).
 
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top