- Joined
- Jan 15, 2002
- Professional Status
- Certified General Appraiser
- State
- California
My advice is to basically ignore the various calculator programs because in real life the contributory value of a solar install varies by location, and by pricing tier. The latter meaning the same install in the same local can have different contributory value depending on the different pricing tiers in which they're found.
The variance for locale isn't minor or trivial, either. Solar installs with the same construction costs are worth more in some local markets and less in others. The only way to reliably value them is to find other properties with an install and check their sale prices against other properties like them which lack the install.
You're not looking for a property that's directly comparable to your property. You're looking for a donor that can be used to identify an adjustment factor for the install, which you can then import for use with the local sales which - aside for lacking solar - really are otherwise among the most similar to your property.
As an example, if your home is 3000sf but you can find an 1800sf home with similar install located across town, that property isn't directly comparable to your property as such. But if you can find other 1800 sf homes in that other neighborhood you can compare their pricing to the w/solar property's sale price to see what difference the solar added to that sale price. Let's say that other property demonstrates a $20,000 premium for the solar, you can then import that $20k adjustment factor for use with your subject's local sales.
Obviously this process works better when you can find several sales of homes w/solar so you can see what the trends are.
The other thing that's tricky about solar is -as you mentioned up front - they don't all have the same capacity and won't all return the same levels of savings. So that makes it helpful to call a couple of the brokers in those transactions to see what the capacity is. Or, you can manually count solar panels off of the overhead imagery and get an idea of similar in size or larger than or smaller than when compared to your install.
I realize that's a lot to take in but it just underscores the difficulties appraisers run into when they encounter features which are atypical. "I feel like it should be worth $xxxxx" isn't what you ever want to hear an appraiser say.
The variance for locale isn't minor or trivial, either. Solar installs with the same construction costs are worth more in some local markets and less in others. The only way to reliably value them is to find other properties with an install and check their sale prices against other properties like them which lack the install.
You're not looking for a property that's directly comparable to your property. You're looking for a donor that can be used to identify an adjustment factor for the install, which you can then import for use with the local sales which - aside for lacking solar - really are otherwise among the most similar to your property.
As an example, if your home is 3000sf but you can find an 1800sf home with similar install located across town, that property isn't directly comparable to your property as such. But if you can find other 1800 sf homes in that other neighborhood you can compare their pricing to the w/solar property's sale price to see what difference the solar added to that sale price. Let's say that other property demonstrates a $20,000 premium for the solar, you can then import that $20k adjustment factor for use with your subject's local sales.
Obviously this process works better when you can find several sales of homes w/solar so you can see what the trends are.
The other thing that's tricky about solar is -as you mentioned up front - they don't all have the same capacity and won't all return the same levels of savings. So that makes it helpful to call a couple of the brokers in those transactions to see what the capacity is. Or, you can manually count solar panels off of the overhead imagery and get an idea of similar in size or larger than or smaller than when compared to your install.
I realize that's a lot to take in but it just underscores the difficulties appraisers run into when they encounter features which are atypical. "I feel like it should be worth $xxxxx" isn't what you ever want to hear an appraiser say.