Mike Kennedy
Elite Member
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2003
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- New York
The responsibility for the SOW decision rests squarely on the shoulders of the Appraiser. "they made me do it" 2-3 years later is no excuse.
"An appraiser must not allow assignment conditions to limit the scope of work to such a degree that the assignment results are not credible in the context of the intended use.
"An appraiser must not allow assignment conditions to limit the scope of work to such a degree that the assignment results are not credible in the context of the intended use.
Comment: If relevant information is not available because of assignment conditions that limit research opportunities (such as conditions that place limitations on inspection or information gathering), an appraiser must withdraw from the assignment unless the appraiser can:
modify the assignment conditions to expand the scope of work to include gathering the information; or use an extraordinary assumption about such information, if credible assignment results can still be developed." *( A huge "if" )
An appraiser must not allow the intended use of an assignment or a client’s objectives to cause the assignment results to be biased."
p.s. I suggest "we just need a number and REALLLLLLY don't wanna know what condition the house is REALLLLY in ......." does NOT reflect the actions of "Typical, Local, Buyers" and is insufficient justification for NOT escalating a Mortgage Finance Appraisal to Interior & Exterior. Hence the work-file retention AND E&O insurance requirement by Banks exist.
p.s. My Vote: what's a drive-by? want my name and E&O, get me inside and let ME measure a house (especially on mortgage lending assignments).
Last edited: