cstu11
Sophomore Member
- Joined
- May 4, 2013
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- California
If people doing inspections for appraisal purpose get licensed, fine by me ! Then USPAP will have to decide if what they are doing falls or does not fall under USPAP,
I would rather have the inspectors licensed . Either an inspection is a skill, or it is not. Either a mistake made during an inspection has a ramification, or it does not. Let inspectors for appraisals have some form of basic license where they do not need to be trainees with goal of becoming appraiser . Plenty of people would want that limited role and be happy with it.
What I see with these inspectors is the lenders /AMC's doing the same thing as with appraisers - trying to get the work done cheap, but still expecting quality and reliability Expecting a person to inspect a house for an appraisal for a loan of $400,000, and paying that inspector person $75 is absurd.
If inspecting is a skill, and it needs reliable people doing it, then pay the inspector properly $150- $200 for each one., Of course is the appraiser also gets paid properly for their end it will not be cheap to get an appraisal done that uses an outside inspector. So what ?.
This obsession with cheap is screwing up the appraisal profession and screwing up valuations and now screwing up inspections, A consumer takes out a home loan once every 3-10 years, and some less than that. Since they rarely do it, whether they pay $100 or $200 more or less is not going to make a difference to their financial well being.
The lack of consistency around inspections makes no sense . If a borrower puts down more $ an inspection is not needed, but if they put down less, inspection is needed - on the same house !!
If an inspection and driving the comps is suddenly not important, then let the appraiser hire a person for those tasks, and drop driving the comps as a requirement to speed things up, an appraiser can decide on a case by case basis if they need to drive a comp.
Let's say the inspector gets $150 and the appraiser $350, now the borrower is paying $500 for a lesser product (in my opinion).
Perhaps they can avoid paying rush fees since presumably the appraiser has agreed to complete them in 48 hours after receiving the inspection data.
The guidance for driving comps is confusing - is it required to achieve credible results or not? The LTV has no bearing on that.