I have a similar situation as the OP (missthang).
I am located in the Mid-Atlantic (Baltimore-Washington area) and I have located a REO property that has been vandalized, according to the listing agent, by the evicted previous owner. The kitchen has no cabinets, no counter-tops, no appliances and 85% of the electric fixtures throughout the house have been removed. Most of the plumbing fixtures in the master bathroom are gone. The back yard is severely overgrown and there is a pool which has been standing unmaintained since Novermber 2007.
I've gotten a repair estimate from a general contractor in the range of $75,000.
My questions are:
1. Should I hire my own appraisal rather than relying the lender's appraisal? Is there any advantage ?
Let me ask you one question....do you think that an appraiser hired and paid by the lender is going is more or less likely to give an honest opinion of value than an appraiser who is hired by you? Keep in mind, the lender does not make money on a deal unless it closes and many lenders pressure their appraisers to make delas work.
2. The lender, who also now ownes the property, would prefer that I go with a conventional mortgage, with the repair amount held in escrow. As a buyer, of an "as-is" property, is it inheritantly safer to go with FHA financing? Is the appraisal and u/w process more strict with FHA?
The lender who owns the property knows that this property, with the needed repairs, is not eligible for a typical FHA loan.
3. Typically how long will conventional lenders allow for repairs to be made? What happens if you don't meet their deadline?