- Joined
- Mar 11, 2008
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Texas
That's quite a different scenario than saying lenders profited from the AMC fees...Oh, this is easy. It's not necessarily profit from AMC's keeping a larger portion of the appraiser fees..... the lenders no longer have to employ Chief appraisers and staff, pay their insurance, Etc to meet their federal law requirements.....
The borrower pays for the appraisal fee AND the AMC service fee. The lender gets off scot-free. Cha-Ching for the last 15+ years.
The only thing that may put a dent in this is the multiple borrower lawsuits happening right now with the bundling of fees being deceptive. But the wheels of Justice turn slowly.
Couple of items to consider:
- none of the lenders I know that employ AMC's ALSO choose not to employ SME's. Granted, the amount of lifting required by the lender is dramatically reduced, but they do still employ Chief Appraisers, reviewers, vendor management folks, etc.
- The fact that the borrower even has to pay for the appraisal is a bit cheeky to me - but then again, they are asking someone for LOTS of money. A modest sum to part with, given the return, wouldn't ya say?
- AMC's have been around for a lot longer than 15 years, but I understand what you're saying
- I doubt if any dents will create significant leakage. IMO, the entire landscape will change. As users of valuation services become more and more comfortable with alternative valuations, appraisal volume will continue to decline. AMC's need appraisal volume to survive just like appraisers do. And it won't be there.