• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Is It USPAP Violation or Reviewer's Opinion

We are talking about different kinds of reviews. There is the immediate review, where the results are passed on to the administrator, who has a chance to respond or review the report.

The other kind of review, usually because the appraisal was flagged or the loan went into default, is a forensic review (it could be months or years down the road ), where the name of the appraiser is typically blacked out. The appraiser might not be aware that a review was performed. I bet many of us had our work forensically reviewed and if the appraisal was fine, we were not informed about it.
I am not aware of a USPAP requirement that a review report state the name of the person whose work is under review.
SR 4-2(d)(iv). Of course, there is the usual 'out'. If the Client requests that the name be witheld... or they just won't tell you... then the review report has to say it was witheld at the request of the Client.
 
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top