• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Is the ANSI-765Z standard being used?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Common sense tells me one does not live in their fireplace. My field sketch shows right where they are, be they a 2x4, 2x5 or 2x6 projection out from the wall they are part of. That is 8 or 10 or 12 sf which is not part of my Apex IV sketch total area as I will draw the straight line of the wall then come back later and free-form draw that Fp in it's location. There it is, a Fp, but there it ain't, 8 or 10 or 12 sf or whatever sf it may have. As for stairways and their projections.....the main floor area gets the credit of the stairway's sf. I guess that's why they call it the "main" floor. It's the second or upper level which does NOT get the sf credit for that stairway. My upper levels sometimes have "holes" in them as I depict where open areas are with stairways or foyers below, or high ceilings above great-rooms. If it is a house with no basement some of these main-level stairflights have closets or pantries built-in from the "back" side of that stairway and this is certainly good used area on that main level. No one has ever told me my sketches lack enough information or that they can not get a "feel" for just what the lay-out is. Really may not matter which level of the house gets stairway sf credit, the problem comes when BOTH levels get the sf counted ! It's one or the other, make a decision.
 
Ross, I think the ANSI standard indicates that it is the upper level that gets credit for the stairs and not the lower. This kind of confusion is why, except in cases where there are large flowing stairs, I tend to just go with the outside measurements.
 
Richard, You are certainly right about the stairway thing creating some confusion. While I may depict a free-form draw entry of where a stairflight may go "up" from the main level I have never attempted to take OUT that area of sq.ftg. from the total of the MAIN level. Giving sf area credit to a space (upper level) which is open air and non-existent flooring is hard for me to do. One day I may be directly challenged on that, however, and I will perhaps give thought to changing my ways. It has been discovered more than once that some of the county assessor mis-entries of home size come from one including these upper level "holes" of area as that field person hastily measured the outside of the ground floor of a nice, (new) boxsy-looking 2-story, and then doubled the floors for the home's total. Then a lowly appraiser comes along and screws things up !
 
Richard, You are certainly right about the stairway thing creating some confusion. While I may depict a free-form draw entry of where a stairflight may go "up" from the main level I have never attempted to take OUT that area of sq.ftg. from the total of the MAIN level. Giving sf area credit to a space (upper level) which is open air and non-existent flooring is hard for me to do. One day I may be directly challenged on that, however, and I will perhaps give thought to changing my ways. It has been discovered more than once that some of the county assessor mis-entries of home size come from one including these upper level "holes" of area as that field person hastily measured the outside of the ground floor of a nice, (new) boxsy-looking 2-story, and then doubled the floors for the home's total. Then a lowly appraiser comes along and screws things up !

Ross, on ANSI standard Z675, I believe the upper floors do NOT get credit for living area, on the presumption that if you can't walk on it, it's not living area. Therefore the first floor get the living area.

For those who are interested in some interesting information on why to use ANSI Z765 as your standard here are two good URL's.

http://www.frea.com/size%20matters.htm

http://www.frea.com/frea/sq_ft.htm

Jim McGrath
 
It was my understanding that the ANSI standard was being brought into play to lesson the confusion of whats being calculated. It is apparent that the confusion still is rampant and many may not be in compliance. Many of the builders in our area consider the total SF - as the area being Heated & Cooled or just the heated area.

When you are building, most building inspectors want to know how much space is being Heated or Cooled- and you need to provide the calculations for the "Living Space". No, you wouldn't try to live in a Fireplace; Closet; on the staircase; or in the kitchen cabinets; the pantry; or a myriad of other places.

So my question would be;
if you have a 2 story Foyer, although you can't walk in that area, you surely need to heat and/or cool that area and needs to be calculated in.
The old FNMA rule is possibly the best, measure the outside of the building and calculate the SF - keep it simple. As far as the people who attempted to sue the appraiser after they were in the house for several months - that would appear to be a real shot in the dark; they re-visited the dwelling THREE times before submitting an offer, what and never brought up a question about the SF to the Realtor :?: :?: Having Sold millions of dollars worth of Real Estate, I can't recall (1) person ever making a decision to buy based soley on GLA - and probably 99% of the decision process to purchase was made by the lady of the house, who in general could care less how many SF are there. Heck if they new how much cleaning was involved, they'd probably opt for a much smaller house.

8)
 
I find it hard to believe that a family could "live" within the confines of a fireplace. Apparently some appraisers counted the chimney chase on the outside of the houses as part of the living space when we were measuring footprints.

I agree, Richard. So, why are we not subtracting interior fireplaces from the square footage? My whole point is that the standard is inconsistent. (I still follow it, however, since I know that most other appraisers do it this way.) It results in a different cost for a fireplace on an exterior wall from one bumping out into a garage, from one in the interior.

It's probably a minor point, but I wouldn't consider it to be a moot point, since the economics of how we do the cost approach is affected.
 
It was my understanding that the ANSI standard was being brought into play to lesson the confusion of whats being calculated. It is apparent that the confusion still is rampant and many may not be in compliance. Many of the builders in our area consider the total SF - as the area being Heated & Cooled or just the heated area.

When you are building, most building inspectors want to know how much space is being Heated or Cooled- and you need to provide the calculations for the "Living Space". No, you wouldn't try to live in a Fireplace; Closet; on the staircase; or in the kitchen cabinets; the pantry; or a myriad of other places.

So my question would be;
if you have a 2 story Foyer, although you can't walk in that area, you surely need to heat and/or cool that area and needs to be calculated in.
The old FNMA rule is possibly the best, measure the outside of the building and calculate the SF - keep it simple. As far as the people who attempted to sue the appraiser after they were in the house for several months - that would appear to be a real shot in the dark; they re-visited the dwelling THREE times before submitting an offer, what and never brought up a question about the SF to the Realtor :?: :?: Having Sold millions of dollars worth of Real Estate, I can't recall (1) person ever making a decision to buy based soley on GLA - and probably 99% of the decision process to purchase was made by the lady of the house, who in general could care less how many SF are there. Heck if they new how much cleaning was involved, they'd probably opt for a much smaller house.

8)

jtrotta, there are many statements here that I believe are incorrect. First, the ANSI standard was set up along with most standards, so everybody would be measuring from the same standard, and wouldn't have one for the builders, one for the county property appraisers, etc. The confusion is only rampant for those who don't know it, or use it. And I don't really care what the builders say, as it my license on the line. Builders misrepresent information all the time in order to sell their houses for the maximum profit.

Building inspectors in my area, only inspect to determine if the improvements are built to code, anything else is outside their realm of responsibility. You also would not try to live the the concrete block walls, but they are considered part of the living area, unless you live in a condo.

On a two story home with a great room that is open to the roof, it is not measured with additional area given to a second floor that is not there. That is sure fire way to end up in court.

I have been appraising long before FNMA came into existence and have not seen that old rule, can you show me where it is?

I am glad you feel that people can't sue over square footage of living area, but in this era where people sue over a hot cup of coffee that they spill in their lap, I think your attitude is unrealistic. People make decisions to buy on many things, and size is one of the major ones. And people make decisions to sue on many things, and mistakes in appraisals are several of them. Even if you are innocent, can prove it, and win your case, you will have spent a lot of money to prove it. And if you have E&O insurance, your insurance company may chose to settle out of court, to save money. This leaves you with a mark on your record, that may cause many clients not to use you again, because you have been convicted of an error.

I would like to see you use the argument, that is was better for the buyer to get less house for the money, in court, because it would be less work. I could use a good laugh in this business.

I only hope for your sake, you are a better appraiser, than lawyer.

Jim
 
I utilize the ANSI standard (have a copy in front of me, its $25 for 11 pages!!) I like having a quasi-adopted standard. Although it is not officially adopted at least the more people that use it the more we will be on the same "page". I don't disagree with it's take on fireplaces (or bay windows for that matter) but also do not feel strongly either way, as long as there is a "standard".

I was a little perplexed by the stair area wording at first however I have seen the light!! It states: "Openings in the floor below cannot be included in the sqaure foot calculations." (no two story foyers) "However, the area of both stair treds and landings proceeding to the floor below is included in the finished area of the floor from which the stairs descend, not to exceed the area of the opening in the floor"

This states that the area of the stairs from the upper floor to the main floor are to be INCLUDED in the upper floor measurment. (no additional openeings included) Additionally the main floor stair to the basement is included in the main floor. again no deduction required!

Lastly two paragraphs down it states "To be included in finished SF calculations, finished areas must have a ceiling height of at least 7 feet except: <snip> ; under stairs where there is no specified height requirement."

This says I do not have to deduct the area below the stairs in a home that does not have a basement. (or the area below the stairs from basement SF). So in the end I read the rule as stateing I DO NOT HAVE TO DEDUCT TYPICAL 3.5' x 10' stair openings. Hence why I liked this standard. I thought it was silly to take SF away from the house/owner. "And when they were only half way up..they were neither up nor down"

I think the guideline is generally clear (if you spend some time with it) and it is people who are interpretting it differently-wrong. : ) It is to bad that the Home Builders Assc. and NAR did not adopt it officially. Like certain people (and most appraisers) I like there being a standard, even if it is not perfect.

I have one freind/associate who wants to deduct the exterior siding. I met another recently also. Apparently one of the back of the matchbook appraisal education schools in the Fort Collins/Denver area teaches them to only give the property credit to the concrete foundation. I told the one guy who was debating with me if he wanted to crawl around and measure the foundation go for it, I use the "Quasi-Adopted" ANSI spec.
 
I once had a regional area manager for Citibank (Chief Appraiser) tell me that when measuring a cape, I should measure the upper level (sloped ceiling area) from the interior - and that I should stop the measurement when my forehead touched the ceiling. Hmm....so I told him that his measurements on the same cape would show a larger GLA than mine -
the reason being that he was much shorter than me.

When I explained, that if everybody just measured the exterior and multiplied times 1.5 or 1.75 (depending on shed dormer or not) - we would all get the same measurements !

To answer your question, no I don't, I use the old fashioned common sense method.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top