- Joined
- Apr 23, 2002
- Professional Status
- Certified General Appraiser
- State
- Oregon
A couple of observations on Cindy and PAREA:
Let the market figure out the demand for appraisers. If there is demand for appraisers and there is not enough supply, the market will figure out a solution. Possibly increase fees so the 'rural' appraiser will decide they can train someone and increase supply. It was working until the "stakeholders" decided there was a shortage (which happens because 'guess what' real estate and mortgage demand has cycles) for reasons that benefit them (like lower fees so AMCs can make more profit).
I know how I got to be an appraiser. I was a real estate salesman, I worked in an assessors office as a residential appraiser for 8-years, where I got experience and education.
Has anyone actually become a PAREA appraiser and 'hung out their shingle' and gotten work? Is the PAREA appraiser suppose to solve the 'rural' appraiser shortage or the 'minority' appraiser shortage? And that gets back to letting the market figure it out, it seems to have worked just fine for the last 30-years until the false narrative of 'shortage' was pushed by AMCs.
Milton Friedman would probably tell you, 'if you artificially increase the supply of appraisers, it will result in appraisers being paid less, and that will then result in there being fewer appraisers, not more, until the demand increases again and fees rise.' Milton famously observed when visiting China that they were using shovels on a road project, not machinery, and was told it was to increase the number of people having jobs, and his response was, "If you want to increase jobs, then they should be using spoons." It would be better to improve the 'productivity' of appraisers than make more appraisers who have less experience and training.
Let the market figure out the demand for appraisers. If there is demand for appraisers and there is not enough supply, the market will figure out a solution. Possibly increase fees so the 'rural' appraiser will decide they can train someone and increase supply. It was working until the "stakeholders" decided there was a shortage (which happens because 'guess what' real estate and mortgage demand has cycles) for reasons that benefit them (like lower fees so AMCs can make more profit).
I know how I got to be an appraiser. I was a real estate salesman, I worked in an assessors office as a residential appraiser for 8-years, where I got experience and education.
Has anyone actually become a PAREA appraiser and 'hung out their shingle' and gotten work? Is the PAREA appraiser suppose to solve the 'rural' appraiser shortage or the 'minority' appraiser shortage? And that gets back to letting the market figure it out, it seems to have worked just fine for the last 30-years until the false narrative of 'shortage' was pushed by AMCs.
Milton Friedman would probably tell you, 'if you artificially increase the supply of appraisers, it will result in appraisers being paid less, and that will then result in there being fewer appraisers, not more, until the demand increases again and fees rise.' Milton famously observed when visiting China that they were using shovels on a road project, not machinery, and was told it was to increase the number of people having jobs, and his response was, "If you want to increase jobs, then they should be using spoons." It would be better to improve the 'productivity' of appraisers than make more appraisers who have less experience and training.
Last edited: