• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Land appraisal revision

OSU Beavers

Elite Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Professional Status
Licensed Appraiser
State
Oregon
Completed a rural subdivision lot appraisal last week. The subject includes a newer drilled well and septic approval. One of the sold comps have wells. One of the listings in the same subdivision is offered with a drilled well and supports the subject's pending sale price.

Revision request from AMC: Remove adjustment for the subject well.

No explanation why.

What is the best way to push back on this nonsense request?
 
Last edited:
My response:

The subject's well adds value as supported by comparable sale four and comparable five, a listing, which both have wells included in their price. No changes to the report are needed. Who is calling for this change, the AMC or the lenders reviewer? A well is an improvement TO the land NOT an improvement ON the land. They apparently do not know the difference.
 
AMC is demanding that I make the change based on the engagement letter:

"Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Quoted $745 for land appraisal per fee sheet- must have approval to proceed if fee will be different. Land purchase closing 4/20, need appraisal back as soon as possible.

CLIENT-SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
1. Land Appraisals –
If the subject has any improvements, appraiser to use a hypothetical condition that those improvements do not exist on the property (report would be completed “subject to” that hypothetical condition)."

I tried to explain to the AMC flunkie over the phone that whoever is coming up with this at the tiny credit union who is the client does not understand the difference between an improvement TO the land and an improvement ON the land.

"Oh ok, I'll push back, but if they want it changed then you have to change the report"

How, can I explain that a drilled and lined well is a utility not a standing improvement?

AI Overview



A well is generally considered an improvement to the land (land improvement/site improvement) rather than an improvement on the land (structure/building) because it enhances the land's utility and value, similar to fencing, septic systems, or paving, rather than being a habitable building.

  • Improvement to Land (Site Improvements): These are infrastructural additions that make the land more useful or valuable, such as utilities, wells, septic systems, driveways, and fences.
  • Improvement on Land (Structures): These are typically buildings or permanent attachments (like a house or barn) that sit on top of the land, generally classified under different tax or construction rules.
I suppose that should work. Any additions that you would include?
 
I received a revision request recently asking me to comment on declining market trend. I had sufficient market data, and plenty of comments, and downward adjustments for older comps. The revision was telling me that zillow and redfin do not show a decline (no proof), and 1004mc is not always accurate. I told them that they are trying to violate the appraiser independence. When i called the BREA they said that simply asking is not an act of influence, and that its normal thing for them to ask (BS state should be on our side not the AMC). It would be a normal question if they had provided actual proof that the market is not declining. This proves that the AMCs have no purpose, and are only taking money for hard working appraisers.
 
Completed a rural subdivision lot appraisal last week. The subject includes a newer drilled well and septic approval. None of the sold comps have wells. One of the listings in the same subdivision is offered with a drilled well and supports the subject's pending sale price.

Revision request from AMC: Remove adjustment for the subject well.

No explanation why.

What is the best way to push back on this nonsense request?
Assuming that your adjustment is warranted and you have support for it..... tell them 'No'. They are allowed to question your work, to ask for additional explanations. They are not allowed to tell you which adjustments to make... or not make.

They are also allowed to request that you appraise the land only...not including any site improvements. They are incorrect regarding the use of a hypothetical condition to do it. Partial appraisals do not require the use of a hypothetical condition. You do have to clearly state what isn't being included in the bundle of property rights you are appraising.
 
Well, could you just make a line that says available water, and adjust for yes or no. Did you say 'well', or maybe just say utilities, site improvements, or some generic term. It does hurt your head after a while hitting it to get rid of the pain. I'm assuming that the site would not meet the sale price without this item. Did you actually put the new AI overview on a new front page, and sent it over.
 
Onlyt responded by messages to the AMC. No movement from the lender yet.

The adjustment was made on the Utility line. The sale and listing lots in the same subdivision with wells are $30,500 more than those listing and sales without. I adjusted by $30,000.

My next try is to call it an On Site Development.
 
Good lawd, a $30k well? How deep are they going?
 
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top