• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Loaded Capitalization Rates Question

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Professional Status
Certified General Appraiser
State
Michigan
I recently took a class that discussed loaded capitalization rates for determining tax burden and as far as I can tell, it works poorly.
The example given included a capitalization rate of 8.5%, a vacancy rate of 5%, an assessment level of 50%, a millage rate of 51.0055, and an NOI of $148,362 (Note this NOI does not include tax).
The calculation to determine the effective tax load is to multiply the millage rate (51.0055) by the assessment level of 50% = 27.1854. Next you convert to mills = 27.1854/1000 = .0271854. Then you multiply by the vacancy rate of 5%. = .0271854 x .05 = .12751. This "0.12751" was called the "effective tax rate - tax load" by the presenter. All you need to do is add this number to your cap rate to get your loaded cap rate: 8.5% + .12751% = 8.628%.

Given the above information, I should be able to get a good estimate of my property's value by dividing the NOI by my loaded capitalization rate: $148,362/.08628 = $1,719,541 is what the assessor stated the property would be worth. This is supposed to save me the trouble of determining taxes before I know what they are going to be.

Here's the rub. Now that I'm assessed $1,719,541, I figured I would calculate my taxes and determine value from the income approach as I typically do. I have a $1,719,541 property so I'll multiply it by the 51.0055 millage rate and divide by 1000 and multiply by my assessment level of 50% as follows ($1,719,541)*(51.0055/1000)*50% = $43,853 worth of tax.

Now I take my tax out of the NOI given above $148,362-$43,853 = $104,509 which is my NOI that accounts for tax. Now I just divide by my unloaded cap rate of 8.5% = $104,509/.085 = $1,229,517.

Prior to this I would utilize Newton's method on my spreadsheet. I did it for the example above to determine that the property is worth $1,342,612 and a fair tax rate would be $32,240. This is how I was doing my calculations prior. Has anyone else run into this issue? I went to a class, got a shiny new toy and it doesn't work. This is also the second time I have seen this taught in a class.
 
I despise adjusting cap rates so I don't do it. For tax assessments I just use mutiple iterations of the forecasted assessment until the resulting NOI caps out to the same conclusion upon which I based my forecasted assessment. Cave man style.
 
I despise adjusting cap rates so I don't do it. For tax assessments I just use mutiple iterations of the forecasted assessment until the resulting NOI caps out to the same conclusion upon which I based my forecasted assessment. Cave man style.

Your "multiple iterations" are what I'm referring to as "Newton's Method". I have no problem killing things with a club.
 
Are you removing the ad valorem taxes as an expense and then loading the cap rate at the end?
 
Are you removing the ad valorem taxes as an expense and then loading the cap rate at the end?

Yes. The class example took the taxes out of the NOI and loaded the cap rate at the end.
 
Yes. The class example took the taxes out of the NOI

Did you mean to say "added" to your NOI?

Higher NOI due to not including taxes as an expense. Higher OAR for the rate load. Don't forget State AND local elements.
 
I've seen other appraisers use this method and it looked like it worked out okay in those situations, so I don't think there's anything wrong with doing it; and I can see how it might be a preferred method for certain asset classes and investors. But I'm a catfish and I do more assignments on properties like Billy Joe Bob's Radiator and Bait Shack or the Moonlight Stop-n-Rob, and my readers are barely grasping the application of an overall rate to begin with.
 
The pro-forma was as follows:
Potential Gross Income = $168,840
Vacancy and Bad Debt = -5% ($8,442)
Effective Gross Income = $160,398

Expenses
Management 3% = $4,812
Commissions 3% = $4,812
Reserves -psf = $0.20 = $2,412

NOI = (168,840-$8,442-$4,812-$4,812-$2412) = $148,362
 
You should have been in the Kenneth Hahn building when the County's chief appraiser almost exploded when he saw his case for the Grand Ladera going down in flames. He didn't want me using DCF and he couldn't unwind the loaded cap rate method in real time. $10M reduction.
 
I've seen other appraisers use this method and it looked like it worked out okay in those situations, so I don't think there's anything wrong with doing it; and I can see how it might be a preferred method for certain asset classes and investors. But I'm a catfish and I do more assignments on properties like Billy Joe Bob's Radiator and Bait Shack or the Moonlight Stop-n-Rob, and my readers are barely grasping the application of an overall rate to begin with.

I get it George. I'm going to the Tax Tribunal and many of my peers use this method. I've used Newton's Method in the past and thought I could step out of my cave. I could be missing something but I'd rather hit my target with a club if I can't figure this out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top