Toast,
You may be unaware that there are large areas of the contry that do not have all of that wonderful computerized data. I work areas that have no online public records - in fact, no computerized public record look up at all. I'm required to spend hours in the county offices looking property by property through the tax rolls to find sales, then drive by each sale in order to determine the size, age and design of the home. The Assessor records are not available, because the Assessor works 3 hours a week - 8 to 11 AM on Saturday. The majority of sales are not through an MLS.
The other fallacy in your response is that you do not give a thought to the expense of the "technology". If a business invests in technology to make them more efficient, THEY should benefit from that investment - AND, they need to budget reimbursement, repair, maintenance and replacement reserves into the fee structure.
Dave Smalley,
How my product is more valuable than the low bidders:
1. I do thorough research, and have data to back up every box that I check, statistic that I report, and statement that I make. I don't pull it out of the air or say whatever will get past the underwriter.
2. I research the listing & sale history through local MLS AND through public records on each of the comparables, as well as the subject (as required by USPAP), and analyze what those histories might be saying about the sales price. I don't just let the defaulted "none found" statement ride for that section of the report with no research to verify it's accuracy.
3. I spend considerable time analyzing the actual differences between the properties and the market responses to those differences. My adjustments are supportable - whether they meet underwriting guidelines or not. They are not just minimal figures plugged in to assure that guidelines are not breached.
4. I take the time to adequately describe the subject. I don't just call everything average, average, average to keep from making adjustments at all.
IN OTHER WORDS, I give a Complete Appraisal with a well developed value conclusion based upon the specific attributes and condition of the subject - not a minimally researched, minimally described, minimally adjusted, minimally analyzed, unverified "average" for the neighborhood value (or a fraudulent one to make the deal close).
The industry complains about the quality of appraisal reports they are getting, while they hire only those appraisers that have so little respect for their profession that they accept fees that require ultra high volume in order to meet expenses and pay themselves minimum wage. Or they have an AMC do their hiring, and the AMC keeps half of the appraisal fee. How hard would you work for half pay?
Make up your mind - do you want a good appraisal, or a cheap one? If you buy cheap, don't complain about the quality. In fact, if you buy cheap, you would have been better off with an AVM. The value is likely to not be any more reliable, and the AVM should be even cheaper.
As my mechanic says, "You can pay me now - or you can pay me later."
Respectfully submitted