Richard Carlsen
Elite Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2002
- Professional Status
- Licensed Appraiser
- State
- Michigan
This may be one of those cases where your best indicator of value is the cost approach. I would carefully work that up and then, using the indicator of value from the sales data approach, bring it all together if, of all places. the reconciliation. Sure your opinion of the most probable sales price might extend beyond the indicated value of the comps, but if you are limited to those values, you will be most likely, low on market value.
I would try to do a full reconciliation but if the UW does not like it, go back to their guidelines and give what you can. But explain fully that the opinion of value is limited by the requirement of the secondary market. Such a property might not make it to the secondary market. This loan may be put in the portfolio.
BTW, I don't think you can peg a Most Probable Minimum Sales Price. The bottom line on selling price is the minimum that the seller will accept. Since you can never know just what a seller's bottom line is nor measure it in the marketplace, there is no way to form an opinion of a MPMSP.
I would try to do a full reconciliation but if the UW does not like it, go back to their guidelines and give what you can. But explain fully that the opinion of value is limited by the requirement of the secondary market. Such a property might not make it to the secondary market. This loan may be put in the portfolio.
BTW, I don't think you can peg a Most Probable Minimum Sales Price. The bottom line on selling price is the minimum that the seller will accept. Since you can never know just what a seller's bottom line is nor measure it in the marketplace, there is no way to form an opinion of a MPMSP.