My Guess as to What Venezuelan Oil Means to the USA

[Mike Ault]

Then why is the agent having issues with internal bleeding? She hit him with the car.

Why did someone spread the story that George Soros paid her to drive from Colorado to be there? She just dropped her son off at school because she lives in Minneapolis. Why did someone post an AI altered video showing the agent lying on the hood of the car (I believe that was you). The first right-wing reaction to anything they don't like is to start lying. They're probably lying about the "internal bleeding" as well.

 

[J Grant]

Common sense, Fern. She was working with a group funded with money sprinkled around by Soros or Soros wannabes, that money is deployed right now big time unless my common sense fails me. Unless she is crazy, why would a women with a bundle of kids she's responsible for do something stupid like that? She was probably financially desperate in one way or another and her husband/wife certainly didn't look capable of taking care of things and things crashed and burned.

Common sense? No proof of it. Of course, proof or facts mean nothing to you.
Even if she made a foolish decision to go there that day, it does not justify an ICE agent killing her- and leaving her six-year-old without a mother. I guess you can celebrate that.

Again, ZERO proof she was a paid protestor

 

[J Grant]

Then why is the agent having issues with internal bleeding? She hit him with the car.

?? Where is a report of him having internal bleeding/
Show me a fact supporting it, not some rumor on X or other low-rent source.

When was the last time reality filled the space between your ears....some time perhaps before you became afflicted with TDS ? )(Trump Deity Syndrome )

 

[J Grant]

Why did someone spread the story that George Soros paid her to drive from Colorado to be there? She just dropped her son off at school because she lives in Minneapolis. Why did someone post an AI altered video showing the agent lying on the hood of the car (I believe that was you). The first right-wing reaction to anything they don't like is to start lying. They're probably lying about the "internal bleeding" as well.

Because these brainwashed cult TDS base are bat sht crazy and believe the RW think tank funded conspiracy theory.

Because there is a mass of them, millions reinfocing the nutiness on social media, they believe it actually makes sense. Or they claim to. Fortunately, they are not the majority of the nation; however, there are enough of them to be alarming. If they came by their opinions honestly/based on fact, it would be a whole other thing.

 

[J Grant]

She didn't get shot for non-compliance. She could have thrown hands with them all day from her window without any of them even considering shooting at her.

Then what did she get shot for?
She posed no imminent threat; her vehicle was pulling slowly away from the curb with the wheels turned away from him as soon as she cut the angle of them after the curb.
It is the police and ICE agents ' job to deal with people who might not instantly comply or who are belligerent. This was real low-level stuff. All he had to do was step half a foot back, and they would record her license plate and then charge her with whatever charge applied.

 

[Terrel L. Shields]

?? Where is a report of him having internal bleeding/

 

[J Grant]

That's a perfectly justified response to someone who just took a swing on you or fled from you or pointed their car at you. She was most definitely a fkg bithc in that moment. She had no right to do that. He had no duty to retreat and every right to point his weapon at her as a threat to stop or else.

In any case, the point stands untouched - she didn't get shot for non-compliance. Same as Ashli Babbitt didn't get shot for non-compliance.

BS - American citizens have rights.

It was idiotic of her not to comply and stop or get out of the car. But her actions posed no threat to life and she did NOT point the car at him. Is it a crime to act like a fckg ***** for a moment in America? Or a crime to act like an asshat, macho, yelling obscenities? So far it is not a crime or excuse for murder.

While her wife (ick ) yelling at the agent was obnoxious, it was rather low key - she was not using obscenities, she did not look high or drunk, she was not agressing agaisnt him and no weapons were present -

Are ICE agents so snowflake sensitive they go into murder rage at a female being disrespectful? If so they need another job.

 

[Mike Ault]

View attachment 106307

Sadly, The Department of Homeland Security is not a credible information source any longer. They been lying nonstop about the deportation process and how many criminals they rounded up.

AI Overview

Yes, independent data analyses, including from government sources, indicate that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has
exaggerated its claims about primarily rounding up dangerous criminals. While the DHS consistently states a high percentage of arrestees have criminal charges or convictions, a significant portion of those individuals have no criminal records or only non-violent, minor offenses.

Key Findings and Discrepancies

• DHS Claims vs. Data: The DHS has repeatedly stated in late 2025 and early 2026 that approximately 70% of individuals arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had a U.S. criminal charge or conviction. However, internal data and independent analyses present a different picture.
• Lack of Violent Convictions: Data obtained by the Cato Institute in late 2025 showed that over 70% of people detained by ICE had no criminal convictions at all (excluding immigration violations), and only about 7% had convictions for serious or violent crimes.
• Definition of "Criminal": Critics point out that the DHS often uses a broad definition of "criminal" that includes pending charges or minor offenses like traffic or immigration violations, which can inflate the numbers and misrepresent the actual threat level of the arrestees.
• Messaging vs. Reality: Investigations by news outlets like NBC Chicago found that the agency's data indicates a focus on "the worst of the worst" is often not matched in practice, with a large percentage of arrestees being non-criminals.
• Internal Practices: Past analyses (from around 2018) of internal memos showed that ICE was ordered to prioritize individuals with criminal records to meet quotas, suggesting a focus on statistics over the actual danger posed to public safety.

In summary, while the DHS does arrest individuals with serious criminal histories, a substantial amount of evidence suggests their public messaging exaggerates the proportion of arrestees who are dangerous criminals.

 

[J Grant]

View attachment 106307

It sounds vague, and because this administration lies all the time and covers up, it is hard to believe it. Where is the medical report or hospital showing he had internal bleeding?

If he had an internal bleed, maybe it came from something else - just as you conspiracy theorists denied covid -

 

[J Grant]

Sadly, The Department of Homeland Security is not a credible information source any longer. They been lying nonstop about the deportation process and how many criminals they rounded up.

AI Overview

Yes, independent data analyses, including from government sources, indicate that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has
exaggerated its claims about primarily rounding up dangerous criminals. While the DHS consistently states a high percentage of arrestees have criminal charges or convictions, a significant portion of those individuals have no criminal records or only non-violent, minor offenses.

Key Findings and Discrepancies

• DHS Claims vs. Data: The DHS has repeatedly stated in late 2025 and early 2026 that approximately 70% of individuals arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had a U.S. criminal charge or conviction. However, internal data and independent analyses present a different picture.
• Lack of Violent Convictions: Data obtained by the Cato Institute in late 2025 showed that over 70% of people detained by ICE had no criminal convictions at all (excluding immigration violations), and only about 7% had convictions for serious or violent crimes.
• Definition of "Criminal": Critics point out that the DHS often uses a broad definition of "criminal" that includes pending charges or minor offenses like traffic or immigration violations, which can inflate the numbers and misrepresent the actual threat level of the arrestees.
• Messaging vs. Reality: Investigations by news outlets like NBC Chicago found that the agency's data indicates a focus on "the worst of the worst" is often not matched in practice, with a large percentage of arrestees being non-criminals.
• Internal Practices: Past analyses (from around 2018) of internal memos showed that ICE was ordered to prioritize individuals with criminal records to meet quotas, suggesting a focus on statistics over the actual danger posed to public safety.

In summary, while the DHS does arrest individuals with serious criminal histories, a substantial amount of evidence suggests their public messaging exaggerates the proportion of arrestees who are dangerous criminals.

That is the problem with the DT admin , it has corrupted the federal agencies and intimidated government employees into lying for fear of losing their jobs, making the information not trustworthy.