• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

NAIFA - Open Letter May 15th

Status
Not open for further replies.
.....send the money to the "marshals and jailers", the state appraisal boards....so much per mortgage, if funded by and through the state.... or GSE's "money" proportioned by number of loans........without the purchase of the rope, there can be no hangings or the threat thereof.....that way any malfeasance could be maintained partially localized or isolated and not transmute nationally through AMC's.....inept state boards could then have their workings reviewed for effectiveness by measuring their appraisers' performance by external review........best to all........rs
 
Last edited:
I believe I have witnessed for the first time a letter more supportive of appraisers then ever seen before from anyone, other then maybe something from Dave Biggers.

There is a lesson to be learned from this by all appraisal organizations. To the NAIFI folks. This is the achilles heel of AI. If you want your membership to increase ten-fold, stop trying to be like AI and try being for example like the NAR! In the NAR all members are equal and the issue side the NAR takes is always in favor of there members, ALWAYS! There is no compromise by the NAR on issues. They stand by there members to the bitter end. Once the law makers/regulators make there stand then it is over, but not until then.


Look at how the NAR supports its members!

Look at how Dave Biggers suppports his customers, Realtors and Appraisers.

Then look at everyone else and you decide who is for you and who is againts you!

There should be no compromise from any appraisal organzation that goes againts the membership! NEVER!
 
Having reviewed, read, and re-read every formal response by every "leading" organization across the board, with the exception of the statements below, IMO, the Naifa response NAILS it.......

"Secondly, the proposed IVPI appears to be one more layer of bureaucracy, a boondoggle ultimately funded by the taxpayers. There are already systems in place for reporting misdeeds, coercion, undue influence, and misleading appraisal reports. Each state has an appraisal licensing/regulatory agency plus a banking department. Those are the "go to" entities for filing complaints and reporting fraud. They actually have the enforcement ability to deal with these issues."

___________________________________________________________
* and have enabled the vested interests to RUN THE GAME - by failure to
ENFORCE the existing Laws.
___________________________________________________________


• Thirdly, the Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC), created by FIRREA, provides a link between FFIEC and state regulatory agencies. This government agency has trained individuals who can assist with investigations and enforcement. Rather than creating a new entity, has the possibility of expanding or enhancing the responsibilities of an existing agency been considered?

_________________________________________________________
* ditto the above
_________________________________________________________

The ASC is already empowered to petition Congress for $$$ ADEQUATE Funding for enforcement of TITLE XI. It has abdicated its' EXISTING
responsibility. IMO, expecting to suddenly ride in wearing the "White Hat"
and a Marshalls' Badge - is unrealistic.

Suggest research exactly who the members of the ASC Committee are - and who their $$$ leading campaign supporters are..... to discover the
Truth.

p.s. the GSEs, under existing law and under the Supervision of the OFHEO, can modify acceptable appraisal processing and quality reguirements at any time absent ANY revisions to Federal Law.​
 
Mike Kennedy said:
* and have enabled the vested interests to RUN THE GAME - by failure to
ENFORCE the existing Laws.

Suggest research exactly who the members of the ASC Committee are - and who their $$$ leading campaign supporters are..... to discover the
Truth.

p.s. the GSEs, under existing law and under the Supervision of the OFHEO, can modify acceptable appraisal processing and quality requirements at any time absent ANY revisions to Federal Law.


Thank you Mr. Kennedy. Excellent points. Excellent letter.
 
ASC Website - Those who ignore history are condemned to repeat it.

The ASC owes its existence to the Savings and Loan Crisis of the 1980's. In 1990, Representative Doug Barnard, Chairman of the Commerce, Consumer, and Monetary Affairs Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, on opening a hearing into Title XI's implementation, remarked:

"Appraisal problems were first brought to light . . . in 1984 in our report on criminal misconduct inside U.S. financial institutions. The report concluded that fraud and self-dealing by officers, directors, and insiders caused or contributed to 50 percent of all financial institution failures recent to the time of the report and that faulty or fraudulent real estate appraisals were systematically used by corrupt or incompetent financial managers to overvalue collateral and to make unsafe, unsound, and even fraudulent real estate loans look adequately secured."

EXACTLY THE CASE 20 YEARS LATER.

Another Subcommittee report, issued in 1986:
"[C]oncluded that faulty and fraudulent appraisals were widespread and that abusive appraisals constituted a prominent factor in the insolvency of hundreds of financial institutions as well as contributing to billions of dollars of losses to the Federal deposit insurance funds, [the Veterans Administration], and [the Federal Housing Administration], to private lenders and mortgage insurers, as well as to issuers of and investors in mortgage-backed securities."

These facts, among other things, led Congress, in August 1989, to enact the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, better known as FIRREA or the "Savings and Loan Bailout Bill." Title XI of FIRREA, the "Real Estate Appraisal Reform Amendments," was specifically targeted at solving the appraisal-related problems discussed in prior Congressional testimony.

In general, Title XI required federally regulated financial institutions, such as federally insured banks, thrifts and credit unions, to use State certified or licensed appraisers to perform appraisals in connection with federally related transactions.

Title XI created what, we think, is a unique, complementary relationship between the States, the private sector, and the Federal government. Title XI recognized that the States were in the best administrative position to certify and license real estate appraisers and to supervise their appraisal-related activities. Title XI authorized the private sector — a private not-for-profit organization, The Appraisal Foundation (and its two independent boards, the Appraiser Qualifications Board and the Appraisal Standards Board) — to establish uniform minimum appraiser qualifications standards and uniform standards of professional appraisal practice which would be applied by the States.

Title XI then created the ASC to oversee the activities of the States and The Appraisal Foundation. All ASC operations, including Title XI-related functions of The Appraisal Foundation, are funded by State certified or licensed appraisers, each of whom pays a $25 annual National Registry fee to the ASC .

Title XI also authorized the Federal financial institutions regulatory agencies -- the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Office of Thrift Supervision, and National Credit Union Administration -- to adopt regulations regarding real estate appraisals made in connection with federally related transactions, including, when appraisals are required, who must perform the appraisals, and the manner in which appraisals must be performed.

** but intentionally neglected painting the Bullseye on the END USERS who enable and reward Fraud. {para 2 above]

Anyone guess why????
 
.....spotted dogs bred to spotted dogs result in spotted dogs, maybe a lot of the above folks are from the same kennel?......best to all.....rs
 
As the author trashes Brokers and loan originators for the woes of the lending industry, just whom do they think dreamed up the option arm/pick your payment negative amortization teaser rate stuff? And, whose wholesale reps constantly came to the MB doors with the marketing materials, incentive programs and Sell, Sell, Sell cheerleaders? It wasn't the loan originators or the Mortgage Brokers.

Take it a step further, which government entities, catering to special interest groups to "give" home ownership opportunities to the allegedly under served got just what they asked for?
The GSE's got jawboned by government agencies to offer some of this zero down stuff, don't you think?

If government was forced to write an honest prospectus of it's contemplated activities (appeasement of special interests and essentially, a coalition of self interested electable majority), wouldn't give away programs and imprudent lending/spending activities be essential elements of a government's business plan?

No $hi# Sherlock?:peace:
 
Last edited:
GREED rules the system.

Follow the money trail.

If the lending industry REALLY wanted reform as it pertains to the valuation of the real property interests that securitze their loans, such reform would already be in place.

"See no evil...hear no evil..."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top