Bob Ipock
Elite Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2002
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- North Carolina
The entire article may be viewed at http://www.appraisalintelligence.com/pub/h...ines/681-1.html
North Carolina Appraisal Board tells Appraisal Foundation state regulator advisory board “not in the best interest of continued cooperation”
November 26, 2002
In a letter dated November 20, 2002, Mel Black, executive director of the North Carolina Appraisal Board, asked the Appraisal Foundation to “reconsider its decision to form a State Regulator Advisory Group.”
Noting that through the Association of Appraiser Regulatory Officials (AARO), of which Black is the immediate past president, the states have been represented on a large number of the Foundation’s task forces, working groups, advisory councils and other committees, the letter expressed full support for “the participation of state regulators in any appropriate federal initiative,” but argued that “the advisory group is not the way to go.”
At its meeting on November 19, the North Carolina Appraisal Board discussed the proposal to form the new group, concluding that “at best, the Foundation will be perceived as unnecessarily appropriating resources to establish an unneeded advisory group that parallels” AARO, and “at worst, some may perceive this act as a bad faith attempt to circumvent” that organization and “to stack the advisory group with Foundation sympathizers.”
“When the Foundation needs input from the states, it should contact the current AARO president,” the letter said. “This advisory group is not in the best interest of continued cooperation between the states and the Foundation.”
“With the AARO-Foundation relationship strained, now is not the time to further damage that relationship by forming a separate advisory group,” the letter said. “There is more to be done by both AARO and the Foundation, but let’s go about that work with respect for the respective structures” of the organizations.
The letter requested a written response that addresses the Board’s concerns and the particular arguments the Foundation has for proposing the advisory group.
Copyright © 2002 October Research, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
North Carolina Appraisal Board tells Appraisal Foundation state regulator advisory board “not in the best interest of continued cooperation”
November 26, 2002
In a letter dated November 20, 2002, Mel Black, executive director of the North Carolina Appraisal Board, asked the Appraisal Foundation to “reconsider its decision to form a State Regulator Advisory Group.”
Noting that through the Association of Appraiser Regulatory Officials (AARO), of which Black is the immediate past president, the states have been represented on a large number of the Foundation’s task forces, working groups, advisory councils and other committees, the letter expressed full support for “the participation of state regulators in any appropriate federal initiative,” but argued that “the advisory group is not the way to go.”
At its meeting on November 19, the North Carolina Appraisal Board discussed the proposal to form the new group, concluding that “at best, the Foundation will be perceived as unnecessarily appropriating resources to establish an unneeded advisory group that parallels” AARO, and “at worst, some may perceive this act as a bad faith attempt to circumvent” that organization and “to stack the advisory group with Foundation sympathizers.”
“When the Foundation needs input from the states, it should contact the current AARO president,” the letter said. “This advisory group is not in the best interest of continued cooperation between the states and the Foundation.”
“With the AARO-Foundation relationship strained, now is not the time to further damage that relationship by forming a separate advisory group,” the letter said. “There is more to be done by both AARO and the Foundation, but let’s go about that work with respect for the respective structures” of the organizations.
The letter requested a written response that addresses the Board’s concerns and the particular arguments the Foundation has for proposing the advisory group.
Copyright © 2002 October Research, Inc. All Rights Reserved.