Me neither, but I don't think the OP has done anything wrong in his commentsI have never described an area by resident's income, whether very wealthy or poor or in between.
Me neither, but I don't think the OP has done anything wrong in his comments
How does "Subject property is located in a stable middle income area..." get construed as describing people instead of neighborhood.The syntax of the "offending" phrase sounds like the OP is describing the people instead of the objective factors that describe a neighborhood.
How does "Subject property is located in a stable middle income area..." get construed as describing people instead of neighborhood.
I other words, if I wanted to make sure it was understood as the generalized income level in the neighborhood, how would you say that?