Chuck Parent
Freshman Member
- Joined
- May 23, 2006
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- New Jersey
I've never encountered this issue before. My subject is a condo, does not meet the minimum site size, the coverage ratio, setbacks, etc. Page 1 of the 1073 asks if the subject can be built to the current density. The answer is no. I checked no, and type "see addendum" in the adjoining box for the explanation in the addendum. This apparently causes a UAD error. The client is asking me to check the yes box, and type "with variance" in the adjoining box. This is misleading IMHO, as there is no guarantee that a variance will be issued. WinTotal told me to work it out with the client, which seems odd. I've answered the question properly on the 1073, with the detailed explanation in the addendum.
I'm curious as to why simply stating that current zoning does not allow rebuilding to the current density is a UAD issue? Is this simply a work around? The addendum is crystal clear, but addendums rarely get read.
I'm aware that a UAD error is generated, but the client solution seems misleading.
I'm curious as to why simply stating that current zoning does not allow rebuilding to the current density is a UAD issue? Is this simply a work around? The addendum is crystal clear, but addendums rarely get read.
I'm aware that a UAD error is generated, but the client solution seems misleading.