• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Online MAI demo - improving the profession?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Financially Feasible

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2007
Professional Status
Certified General Appraiser
State
Pennsylvania
This just in (well... it's a couple of days old anyway! :icon_mrgreen:) from the Appraisal Instutite regarding the "45-day Notice of Proposed Amendments to Appraisal Institute Bylaws and Regulations". I know how people feel about the SRA "cliff class"... but this should bring out some good, passionate feelings... :peace:

45-Day Notice of Proposed Amendments to Appraisal Institute Bylaws and Regulations
At its meeting on August 14-15, 2008 at the Hyatt Regency Hotel, Chicago, Illinois, the Appraisal Institute Board of Directors will consider proposed amendments to Appraisal Institute Regulation No. 1. The full text of the proposed changes is available on the "My Appraisal Institute" page of the Appraisal Institute's Web site at www.appraisalinstitute.org. (You will need to enter your username and password on the home page to reach the "My Appraisal Institute" page.) The full text is also available upon request to the National Office. Unless otherwise noted, the proposed changes have no, or minimal, financial impact.
If you have any comments on the proposed changes, please contact your elected Directors and/or send your comments via email to 45daynotice@appraisalinstitute.org. Comments sent to this email address will be compiled for distribution to the Board of Directors prior to the Board meeting.
I. Online General Demonstration Report Alternative
Over recent years, the requirements for the MAI designation have significantly increased:
  • The entire qualifying education curriculum was reviewed and re-written. These new courses are more rigorous and include more content.
  • The number of education hours and the body of knowledge expected of an MAI member has significantly increased.
  • The general experience review process was updated to bring 1,500 more hours of the Associate Members' work under the more rigorous "final level" review criteria.
  • The Comprehensive Examination was a one day test but is now a two day test with four modules.
The Admissions and Designations Qualifications Committee (ADQC) constantly monitors requirements for the designations to help ensure that such requirements prepare professionals to meet the challenges and expectations of the market. That monitoring includes seeking input from Designated Members, Associate Members, and users of appraisal services among others.
Based on this monitoring process, the ADQC continues to believe in the importance of requiring effective analysis and expression from general Associate Members and that the demonstration appraisal report requirement, the research report alternative, and multiple reports alternative are effective tools to do so. The ADQC also believes that the demonstration appraisal report requirement can be enriched, can take advantage of advanced technology, and can provide the flexibility to better enable committed appraisers to complete the requirement while fulfilling the professional and personal demands of today.
Therefore, the ADQC proposes amending Regulation No. 1 to provide for an Online General Demonstration Appraisal Alternative to the traditional demonstration appraisal report. This Alternative would integrate the goals of the traditional demonstration appraisal report into an online format with an "Advisor" and other resources. The result of the process would be a product that demonstrates high levels of analysis and expression. This Alternative would examine not only the Associate Member's competence but would facilitate enhancement and development of the skills being tested.
To be eligible for the Online General Demonstration Report Alternative, a general Associate Member would need to have completed Level I and Level II education requirements, the college degree requirement, and a demonstration appraisal seminar, as well as be current in Standards and Ethics requirements,.
Before a general Associate Member would receive permission to work with an Advisor, the general Associate Member would need to summarize initial research on the subject property that indicates the property is appropriate and that sufficient data exists. The general Associate Member would need to complete the various components of an appraisal including an introduction (cover page through improvements), market analysis and highest and best use, land valuation, cost, sales, income, and reconciliation. These sections would be completed and graded in stages. The Advisor would provide access to resources for each section as appropriate. A general Associate Member would have six (6) months to complete the process.

The proposed changes to Regulation No. 1 can be adopted only if at least 60% of Directors with voting rights relating to the designation requirements in Regulation No. 1 vote in favor at the Board of Directors meeting, regardless of how many Directors are present at such meeting.

II. Equivalencies for Level I Education for General Associate Members Outside the United States
A general Associate Member in the United States who is state certified satisfies the Level I examination requirements for the MAI designation. Regulation No. 1 provides that if a general Associate Member whose principal place of business is outside the United States meets the requirements for certification in the general Associate Member's country, the Associate Member satisfies the Level I examination requirements (except USPAP or its equivalent) for the MAI designation. This alternative has proved impractical in many countries.
Therefore, the Admissions and Designation Qualifications Committee, Education Committee and International Relations Committee recommend amending Regulation No. 1 to provide that if a general Associate Member outside the United States passes the examination for a Level I International Equivalency Examination (initially based on the retired Course 320: General Applications), such general Associate Member will be deemed to have satisfied the Level I education requirement for the MAI designation.
The proposed changes to Regulation No. 1 can be adopted only if at least 60% of Directors with voting rights relating to the designation requirements in Regulation No. 1 vote in favor at the Board of Directors meeting, regardless of how many Directors are present at such meeting.
III. General Demonstration Appraisal Report Content Requirement
Regulation No. 1 requires that a traditional general demonstration appraisal report include a detailed supply and demand study for the subject property type. The Admissions and Designation Qualification Committee (ADQC) recommends amending that provision to enable the general Associate Member to include a detailed supply and demand study for the subject property type or an analysis of either functional obsolescence or external obsolescence.
Appraisal Institute members often encounter obsolescence in the market. Providing general Associate Members with an opportunity to properly demonstrate the analysis of obsolescence within a demonstration appraisal report is a meaningful alternative to including a detailed supply and demand study for the subject property type. An MAI Designated Member should have the requisite education and experience to properly develop an appraisal of a property that suffers from some form of obsolescence, but current rules do not specifically require a general Associate Member to demonstrate this skill unless the property that is the subject of the demonstration appraisal report suffers from some form of obsolescence.
The proposal would maintain other requirements for the traditional demonstration appraisal report, including:
  • The property that is the subject of the demonstration appraisal report must allow for the demonstration of the proper methods of handling physical incurable depreciation and must allow the proper analysis and development of a net income.
  • All forms of depreciation present in the subject property must be identified and measured completely and properly in all three approaches to value.
  • The demonstration appraisal report must meet the criteria set forth in The Official Guide to Demonstration Appraisal Reporting published by the Appraisal Institute.
The proposed changes to Regulation No. 1 can be adopted only if at least 60% of Directors with voting rights relating to the designation requirements in Regulation No. 1 vote in favor at the Board of Directors meeting, regardless of how many Directors are present at such meeting.
 
education has never assured integrity or competence............politicians come to mind..........
 
Already been the topic of discussion in the Commercial/Industrial subforum.
 
education has never assured integrity or competence............politicians come to mind..........

It is funny. I've never seen anyone post that education guarantees integrity (or ethics or whichever phrase works best), yet I see declarative statements like this all the time.

Does lack of education guarantee eithics?
 
I think they have to do this since they did it to the SRA

And no, education does not equal ethics but education is always a good thing. The more you can get, the better (in particular when it is pertinent to your job).

Thus says the uneducated minion....
 
Education will not ensure ethics, but when all it takes in this biz is a GED it's no wonder we will never perceived as professionals.

TC
 
Serena, what they are doing with the Online Demo for the MAI designation is very different than the alternative demo for SRA. The only real difference from what I have read is the report gets graded in sections rather than all at once.
 
Dang Couch! I want them to make it a lot easier so that thousands of appraisers all of a sudden get their MAIs. Oh well, guess they won't do that, will they? Being that they are all about the MAI.

I miss the old Society days....
 
I doubt the online demo will be any easier than doing a traditional demo. However, I think that it will get more people to finally write their demos because it will be broken down into smaller sections rather than one huge report.

The fact that a mentor will be assigned to each person working on the online demo should also help keep people on task so that they get it done.

I passed the comprehensive exam in February and still haven't finished my demo. I have started it, but there are no deadlines to get it done and I'm buried up to my eyeballs in work so it's easy to keep pushing it off. I think having a six month deadline to get it done and having someone checking in on your progress on a regular basis is a good thing.

I think we should wait and see what the final product is before we all assume it will be easier. I doubt that it will be any easier, just more structured with deadlines to keep people on track.
 
I appear to have found an AI support area.....lol...most appraisers I deal with are disillusioned about all the existing large appraisal associations and feel more like they have let down their own members and the appraisal profession as a whole.

Before letting the hair on the back of your necks stand up get defensive, I am very interested in learning how the existing associations fought back to the abuses of new appraisers, how they fought the implementation of the AMCs, how they fought to keep the appraisal process unbiased and un-compromised, did they fight for the collateral based loans when credit worthiness was becoming the norm, did they create rules for the professional members to keep from investing in the AMCs and thereby protecting the independence and integrity of the appraisal profession? And who suffered the most, the lending or appraisal professions, or the consumer?

Appraisers need to speak out for adequate property inspections and full appraisals reports that protect the consumer and investor, whether they want it or not.

The appraiser was always supposed to report the accurate value of the subject property, regardless of the intended use of the report and the desires of the participants of the transaction........to report the estimated value based on market data that was defend-able and supportable. The appraisers that stood their ground for honest and competent reports and would not cave into the pressure lost work for their integrity and all the "in place" associations, foundations and state and federal regulatory departments allowed it to happen. So jump on board as they call for more members, more power and more support.

I am waiting and watching for something new that promotes integrity, honesty and competency. Only then will appraisers regain the public trust.

I have to go, so I won't be able to read all of you yelling at me. I am new here so I will await my chastising because you have discussed it all before. I will not tire of attempting to accomplish what is right for the appraisal profession, when this is over and the fat lady sings, I will be tapping my feet in rhythm because I did not tire, regardless of the outcome.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top