leslie7622
Freshman Member
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2020
- Professional Status
- General Public
- State
- New York
Hi,
We received a very low appraisal value and we are in the process of submitting a rebuttal. The property received multiple offers and was sold within days of relisting (previous buyer was not able to close due to losing his job from covid 19). Previous appraisal was at LP of 675K from an appraiser in the town. Current appraisal was at 600k and did EXTERIOR ONLY (property was vacant and unfurnished).
The rebuttal we are submitting is below. Any suggestions for revisions? Our lender is loandepot.
Unfortunately we are dealing with a very unique property, but desirable multi family in
the desirable area of Passaic Park with very little to no like properties to compare it
to.
Compared to the subject property we have 287 Cleveland Ave in Lyndhurst which is
a similar neighborhood. Although, Cleveland ave like Lafayette is a completely renovated 3 family
that is smaller in size and sits on a smaller lot, this home offers similar beds
& baths and like Lafayette has a finished basement with a bath and has the legal qualification
of being a 3-family versus the 2-family comparable sales currently used in the report.
The current appraisal report used comparable properties are that are 2 family
(the subject property is a 3-family). Although adjustments were made for additional
bathrooms and building square footage, we believe that the legal qualification of an extra
unit holds more value than additional bathrooms and square footage.
Compared to the subject property we have Grace terrace which was already previously
used in the report.
(1) The current report currently uses an adjustment of +$30,000 due to
Grace terrace having a building square footage of 3795 sq ft vs the subject property's
building square footage of 2795. However, the building square footage of Grace Terrace
includes the finished basement (calculated when it was still allowed to include
the finished basement's square footage) while the subject property's square footage does not.
Without the finished basement, Grace Terrace's building square footage is approximately
2795 sq ft and the current $30,000 adjustment should not be considered in the comparison.
(2) The subject property also sits on more than double the lot size of Grace Terrace
(11830 sq ft vs 3750 sq ft) but no adjustments were made for this in the report.
(3) In addition, the subject property's roof, facilities, and interior finishes are all
new (2 new furnaces, 2 new hot water heaters, NEW ROOF, new doors, new windows, new
plumbing, new electrical wiring) while Grace Terrace did not yet the adjustment for
overall condition was only for $18,000 in adjustments despite the renovation list
(attached in current report) stating that total renovation work costed $295,000. We believe
that the adjustment should be much higher.
(4) The subject property also has additional finished space above the garage of
approximately 700 sq fit that Grace Terrace did not have that was not considered
in the comparison.
(5) The subject property also has 2 utility rooms in the basements that Grace Terrace did
not that was not considered in the comparison.
(6) The subject property also has an extra kitchen in the third unit that Grace Terrace did
not that was not considered in the comparison.
(7) The subject property also has a legal qualification of an extra unit (3-Family)
vs Grace Terrace only having a legal qualification of only 2 units (2-Family) that
was not considered in the comparison.
Lastly we have a 2 family which is 7 wood st in Garfield which has similar interior
square footage. Although a 2 family (vs the subject property being a 3 family),
it has an additional summer kitchen and full bathroom. It's also a town over and
is in a very similar neighborhood.
We received a very low appraisal value and we are in the process of submitting a rebuttal. The property received multiple offers and was sold within days of relisting (previous buyer was not able to close due to losing his job from covid 19). Previous appraisal was at LP of 675K from an appraiser in the town. Current appraisal was at 600k and did EXTERIOR ONLY (property was vacant and unfurnished).
The rebuttal we are submitting is below. Any suggestions for revisions? Our lender is loandepot.
Unfortunately we are dealing with a very unique property, but desirable multi family in
the desirable area of Passaic Park with very little to no like properties to compare it
to.
Compared to the subject property we have 287 Cleveland Ave in Lyndhurst which is
a similar neighborhood. Although, Cleveland ave like Lafayette is a completely renovated 3 family
that is smaller in size and sits on a smaller lot, this home offers similar beds
& baths and like Lafayette has a finished basement with a bath and has the legal qualification
of being a 3-family versus the 2-family comparable sales currently used in the report.
The current appraisal report used comparable properties are that are 2 family
(the subject property is a 3-family). Although adjustments were made for additional
bathrooms and building square footage, we believe that the legal qualification of an extra
unit holds more value than additional bathrooms and square footage.
Compared to the subject property we have Grace terrace which was already previously
used in the report.
(1) The current report currently uses an adjustment of +$30,000 due to
Grace terrace having a building square footage of 3795 sq ft vs the subject property's
building square footage of 2795. However, the building square footage of Grace Terrace
includes the finished basement (calculated when it was still allowed to include
the finished basement's square footage) while the subject property's square footage does not.
Without the finished basement, Grace Terrace's building square footage is approximately
2795 sq ft and the current $30,000 adjustment should not be considered in the comparison.
(2) The subject property also sits on more than double the lot size of Grace Terrace
(11830 sq ft vs 3750 sq ft) but no adjustments were made for this in the report.
(3) In addition, the subject property's roof, facilities, and interior finishes are all
new (2 new furnaces, 2 new hot water heaters, NEW ROOF, new doors, new windows, new
plumbing, new electrical wiring) while Grace Terrace did not yet the adjustment for
overall condition was only for $18,000 in adjustments despite the renovation list
(attached in current report) stating that total renovation work costed $295,000. We believe
that the adjustment should be much higher.
(4) The subject property also has additional finished space above the garage of
approximately 700 sq fit that Grace Terrace did not have that was not considered
in the comparison.
(5) The subject property also has 2 utility rooms in the basements that Grace Terrace did
not that was not considered in the comparison.
(6) The subject property also has an extra kitchen in the third unit that Grace Terrace did
not that was not considered in the comparison.
(7) The subject property also has a legal qualification of an extra unit (3-Family)
vs Grace Terrace only having a legal qualification of only 2 units (2-Family) that
was not considered in the comparison.
Lastly we have a 2 family which is 7 wood st in Garfield which has similar interior
square footage. Although a 2 family (vs the subject property being a 3 family),
it has an additional summer kitchen and full bathroom. It's also a town over and
is in a very similar neighborhood.