An idea for a comment:
Due to the lack of recently, similar, sold sales with an out door (utility) kitchen (which can be common for many areas in Louisiana), it was necessary to expand research beyond the immediate neighborhood (market). However, there was no market evidence indicating that demand prefer an out door kitchen comparable to the subject property, as of the effective date according to the additional scope of work involved.
The Appraiser found one sale more than 3 miles away from the subject property, which did have an out door kitchen; even-so, this sale had more than 1,000 (GLA) than the subject property and, not considered comparable. This sale, however, was paired. The location didn't appear to have an affect on market value, but, the variance in size did conclude that the paired sale analysis did not give an adequate read for the adjustment or additional scope of work being discussed.The analysis resulted in a mis-interpretation of market behavior due to the variance in size. The Appraiser added this sale as a fourth (similar) sale in order to show the client the additional scope of work. The analysis portrayed this sale as a similar and not a comparable.
Therefore, due to the lack of market activity (supply/demand), it's our opinion that the improvement (out door kitchen) in question doesn't hold any contributory value as of the effective date. The out door kitchen is known as an over-improvement for the market area (super adequacy).
No adjustment was made.
Mary Alice,
make sure the out door kitchen doesn't hold any contributory value. I highly recommend that you go back and read Mr. Shields' response after taking into consideration all of the replies. Mr. Shields is familiar with Louisiana, as well. make sure there are no comparables that may have an offsetting feature.