A
Anonymous
Guest
Interesting thread and reminds me of one I started a few weeks ago about a 5,000 SF home in a small town school district that will be the largest house in the school district and I took a functional discount for superadequacy.
If I read post 2 correctly, an over-improvement would be external (environmental?) obsolescence and reflects the condition I allude to above instead of a super-adequacy which suggests only a component or components of that improvements were excess to the market "norm."
I like that distinction, and I think it would answer the questions I asked weeks ago. I should have reflected an external obsolescence, because if the dwelling was in the appropriate neighborhood (the other side of county, lakeside, etc.) there would be no items super-adequate. I.e.- a $40,000 chandilier is super-adequate in most markets, but a new home in the slums is an over-improvement.
Terrel
If I read post 2 correctly, an over-improvement would be external (environmental?) obsolescence and reflects the condition I allude to above instead of a super-adequacy which suggests only a component or components of that improvements were excess to the market "norm."
I like that distinction, and I think it would answer the questions I asked weeks ago. I should have reflected an external obsolescence, because if the dwelling was in the appropriate neighborhood (the other side of county, lakeside, etc.) there would be no items super-adequate. I.e.- a $40,000 chandilier is super-adequate in most markets, but a new home in the slums is an over-improvement.
Terrel