I didn't pick any of the choices in the survey. But I will give a short synopsis how we tried to crack the code.
My mentor and I tried to "tag team" the low fee AMC issue with the mentality of bare minimum of comps, bare minimum of commentary. Wham bam thank you ma'am appraisals, while still adhering to the fundamentals of a well-supported report.
After all, we've seen (as many of you have) reports that said AMC's were accepting. Non-competitive sales in location and/or Construction, lack of bracketing, out of the area sales without location adjustments, lack of time adjustments, boilerplate nonsense not pertaining to the subject at hand, finalized with a value from who knows where the number came from.
Surely, we could do better. Well,
we failed.
Minimum of six comparable sales. Explanations of expanding the parameters of time and distance, bracketing of GLA and site area, inclusion of sales with identical bed, bath count, explanation of externalities, special features, adjustments..... you know, an appraisal report. But it was a minimum of a $600 report, not a $300 report.
Thus, we were unsuccessful at providing a $300 report that were to our standards. Our morals and ethics, keeping our licensure safe, adhering to USPAP and the certifications within the report got in the way.
Right now, I'm not doing any AMC work or much appraisal work at all. I'm fixing water damage between the upstairs and downstairs bathrooms. We are lucky that the wife has suitable income in order for us to do this. In me doing this, we are saving a boatload of money in construction costs.
When finished, I'll reevaluate getting back into the game or throwing in the towel.