You know, I think what I said is fine and I stand by it. USPAP says we must be competent prior to accepting an assignment. So if some of you want to scold me for scolding the OP, you go right ahead, but I think you do our profession more harm by scolding me than you do by giving the OP a pass. The mortgage world is not the only world out there and this is not a mortgage appraisal. So maybe the OP is using UAD terms as reference on the forum or maybe they are in fact completing a non-lender assignment on a 1004!?! I do take offense to all of this on a personal and professional level. Professionally, stuff like this makes us all look bad. Who do we look bad to? The REI world, who, could be a source of work for all of us, but with yahoos running around writing up reports that look like mortgage appraisals, its worse than laughable. The REI world knows as much about an appraisal and markets as we do, maybe more, so the bar for acceptability with that client type is going to be higher - all the mortgage BS isn't going to cut it. The OPs client does not need an appraisal because they don't know how to value the property. That client needs an independent 3rd party to sign a piece of paper they can show to the seller (who happens to be a bank) as a second and professional opinion. The grid I presented is my own, a property I made an offer on last week. Any of you who would like to know how an investor thinks, go ahead and keep that for reference. There are also numerous investor forums out there too.
And for the record, I may have scolded the OP, but I also gave a detailed explanation of what to do AND also said each one of us has made the same mistake.
So after months of free-for-all bashing, all of a sudden the forum gets sensitive? Well, maybe its about time.