leasedfee
Member
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2007
- Professional Status
- Certified General Appraiser
- State
- Colorado
I think they tried something in the early 2000s. There'd have to be a quid pro quo credit system. And you'd couldn't just say "Um, the cap was 7%" but would have to demonstrate (i.e., data input revenue and expense lines) how the 7% was arrived at, as well as a standardized format to get to a uniform cap rate.Didn't AI try to do that several years ago? The biggest argument against a national system is mostly all we have to sell is our knowledge. There are too many free riders who will never contribute anything to such a data base. And then there's the quality issue. . . .
CB, your argument is a very strong one no doubt. I guess that the counter argument is that commercial skippies don't extract cap rates -- some of them don't even know what that means -- much less derive a slightly realistic NOI. We're already being underbid by them in the RIMsified world ...... Why would they take time to contribute data to have the credits to get data when they can whimsically type "Korpacz and CoStar reports ..... "? Ta Da. Done.
On an autobiographical note,two decades ago I caught myself being territorial in withholding info to a colleague at a boring gov't office job. Afterwhich I immediately decided that was not the professional I aspired to be and have tried to be the opposite giving information, knowledge, and advice freely. I've found that it has always been reciprocated.