Thus such reviews are a bank compliance document with little real use.
(my bold)
As someone who has and currently does work with banks' and credit unions' compliance and risk departments, I can disagree with the bolded part emphatically.
Appraisals and appraisal reviews are not the end-all in the loan process. Many of us have an over-inflated view of what we do as it fits within the entire dynamic. However, when there are issues, the appraisal and appraisal review becomes very important. And when an institution is holding the paper, that importance is more than just compliance.
Clients expect appraisals to be credible (and usually they are). Client's expect reviews to confirm whatever the review SOW requires (and usually they do).
When the appraisal isn't credible or fails some other benchmark (IAG compliance, for example), that stops the process and I assure you stopping the process moves the appraisal
and appraisal review it to a higher degree of scrutiny.
An entity producing appraisals is not going to last too long if that entity continues to produce non-credible or non-compliant appraisals.
An entity producing appraisal reviews is not going to last too long if that entity doesn't know what it is doing and cannot support the reason why it has stopped the process to have some item in the original appraisal addressed.
There is a
real use for reviews. It ranks to the same level as the
real use of appraisals. If one thinks that appraisals are of little real use, then a review appraisal would fall in that same bucket.
Personally, I think my appraisals are of real use (and apparently, so do the clients who pay me; otherwise, they'd get it done by someone else for less and quicker). I say the same for my reviews (and apparently, so do the clients who pay me; otherwise, they'd get it done by someone else for less and quicker).