Now, if all that fails and the property becomes an REO, then a new assignment is generated. In that case the lender seeks 4 values- market value as is and as repaired and liquidation value under a forced shorter marketing time of say 60-120 days (depends on the lender) both as is and as repaired.
Brad,
I need your comment on those 4 values of REO addendum because you look at many of those addendums and I would like to know how appraisers justify the market value vs. short marketing time value either in as is or as repaired.
Most REO properties are in declining markets in which the owner is not able to pay the loan and is not able to sell the property in a typical or short sale market. However there are times that REO is not due to declining market. It could be due to other factors like divorce or illness but lets try the current REO market, which is definitely due to declining market.
As you said correctly, the addendum is asking for 4 values: short marketing time value which is 60-120 and market value which is lets say 120-180 days.
I would like to know how do you expect the appraiser justify the longer DOM for the market value of the property: Do you think the longer marketing time (120-180 days) should cause a higher, lower or equal value?
In some market the values are literally declining 1-2% per month and if the appraiser says the short time market value, which would be 60-120 days, would be $200,000, what would be the market value of the same property that remains on the market 120-180 days? If we agree that the market is declining, then the market value of the property that remains on market more than 120 days would be less than short marketing time value which requires may be 1-120 days and if so do you see that in the addendums on market value that takes the longer marketing time and gets a lower value?
It seems that in the declining market, the short time marketing value is market value and the length of marketing time wouldn’t generate higher value and therefor should not be recommanded.