- Joined
- Jan 15, 2002
- Professional Status
- Certified General Appraiser
- State
- California
The conventional wisdom is that the existing use is usually the HBU unless/until the underlying land value exceeds. The other consideration that doesn't get a lot of attention is the risk factor. In the development game, if "as vacant" and "as improved" are similar then the no-risk decision is to leave the property "as is". That does away with all the unknowns and contingency factors.
Gotta give some consideration to financing, too. An SFR being purchased and used as such is eligible for residential rates and terms. Properties purchased for redevelopment or conversion to non-residential use face completely different rates and terms, including the more limited LTVs.
No lender wants to get caught offering what amounts to a 95% LTV @ 5% loan on a property that was purchased to redevelop.
Gotta give some consideration to financing, too. An SFR being purchased and used as such is eligible for residential rates and terms. Properties purchased for redevelopment or conversion to non-residential use face completely different rates and terms, including the more limited LTVs.
No lender wants to get caught offering what amounts to a 95% LTV @ 5% loan on a property that was purchased to redevelop.