Jo Ann Meyer Stratton
Elite Member
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2002
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Arizona
About 8-9 years ago I did an appraisal of some property belonging to a couple that raced dragsters professionaly. They had built on five acres high up on the side of a mountain with excellant views. Access to their site was about 2 miles of private dirt easements. The site did not have water available, so water was hauled five miles from the nearest city metered water for water haulers in the area. The structure was 18' high, constructed out of galvanized iron walls and roof, the lower 5,000 square foot floor was their garage, workshop, equipment supply room, bath and utility room. The upper level was a 700 square foot livable area with living room, dining area, kitchen, bath and bedroom. Surrounding the livable area on two sides of the exterior was a wrap around balcony where they had views of the mountains 75 miles away. Construction quality and materials of everything was very good. And it was in an area where a famous architect in the Phoenix areas builds custom homes (and government buildings) out of galvinized metal. The highest and best use of the property was residential. So I found comparables of homes with 2,000 to 3,000 square foot attached and detached garages, houses with less than 1,000 square feet, houses on five acres or more, houses that hauled water--ending up with six comparables. Had pages of addendums that expained everything I could possibly think of. The loan closed without a whimper, call back or a word from the client or home owner. So after you have determined the highest and best use, then its research, research, explanation, explanation, explanation--and then the appraisers job is done. Then the loan officer has to go to work and earn their commission in finding the appropriate loan process for the borrower. So now I can say I have appraised a garage with an attached house instead of a house with an attached garage.