Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.
I favor sensitivity analysis using directly comparable properties. Like any other tool it works better sometimes than others. Also helpful to bracket the subject's dominant attributes. I use it for various adjustment factors, not just sizes.
Thanks for sharing. Props to any tool that helps appraisers support their adjustments. I use Solomon Adjustment Calculator, which aids in sensitivity analysis and depreciated cost analysis. Use tools like these, insert the results directly into your reports, impress clients, reduce stips and ROVs, reduce risk, increase fees, make more money.
Inasmuch as none of the buyers and sellers even apply line item adjustments, they're not important to the principals in the market. They're certainly not important enough for you or Richard Hagar to get as excited as you do over exactly which method the appraiser uses to develop them. Etc., etc.
Fannie's primary objection is that pulling adjustments off a list or out of thin air is counterproductive. Anything is better than nothing. As far as I'm concerned, if the appraiser can explain what they're doing and how their tool works then that's sufficient.
The worst thing that happens when an appraiser uses a sub-optimal combination of adjustment factors is that they end up having to use more personal judgement to reconcile the wider-than-necessary range. Which is exactly what the buyers and sellers are doing, except they're not even getting the assist from adjustments.
This advice is intended for those who wish to remain in blissful ignorance. Accept it and pay the consequences soon. Just ask the California appraisers who now have nothing to protect themselves against the bogus racism claims.