So I'm looking at what you posted and, here are my thoughts.
Comps 3 and 4 should be paired sales, being only 6 sf different in GLA, that you could extract the garage adjustment.
But you can not, because whatever adjustments you made prior, negated the economic difference for one garage stall. And I would question Comp 4 not having a driveway. Here, side of the street parking is far inferior to a driveway. So my thought here is that Comp 3 should not have had a negative adjustment, or Comp 4 has not had enough negative adjustments.
So the paring of Comps 3 & 4 tell me your previous adjustments are not correct.
So if we remove your previous adjustments from Comps 3 and 4, we get a direct 1 garage is worth $3,500 when compared to side of the street parking.
Nope.
So you need to really look at Comp4 sale price being high for not having a garage, or Comp 3 sale price being very low when it has a garage. There is something else missing, location, quality, age, condition, financing concessions. I don't know but there is something just not right in your previous work, either the research or the analysis.
Comps 2 and 5 should be paired sales having all things similar, except for GLA but the difference is only102 SF so the adjusted prices should be closer at this point.
Either your positive adjustment to Comp 2 is too small, or your negative adjustment to Comp 5 is too small.
You're comps don't bracket the bathroom, which, there is more utility in a second toilet than in a second shower, so either find one with a 1 bathroom or one with a 2.1 bathroom so you can compare it to the 1.1 baths to get the adjustment for the extra toilet.
Also, you did not bracket the garage. Check that Comp 4 really doesn't have a garage or a driveway.
Fix the first adjustments, or question the financing, quality, condition, location of the comps for something you have missed.
Good luck.
.
.