Metamorphic said:
If three quarters or more of the sales that are closing are REOs why are REO transactions not typical? Sure maybe 18 out of 20 years they're non typical, but in many markets right now they're as typical as can be and by extension what's normally an undue motivation is perfectly normal motivation.
This is a simplistic analysis of an issue with many complex influences. By definition REO transactions are not typical. This is not to say that the data is not to be considered, analyzed and reported, nor does it imply that REO transactions are not valid comparables. However, there are potential conditions of sale that need to be evaluated beyond what most would consider typical course of business. Some issues of consideration are:
1) Who owns the loan ... is it a bank in their portfolio, a securitized loan, an investment group that acquired a portfolio of distressed/non-performing debt, etc.
2) Is the loan insured, if so for how much?
3) What is the true condition of the property, not just currently, but did the lender/investor advance funds to prepare the home for sale
4) What was the outstanding balance of the loan when the property was obtained, inclusive of legal costs, penalties, etc?
Why are these issues important? Because who owns the loan will influence the decision process on the sale. Regulated financial institutions such as banks, S&Ls, credit unions have reserve requirements that are based on the composition of their portfolio and the status of those investments. Reserve requirements for performing loans are lower than non-performing loans and REO represents even high reserve requirements. These increased reserve requirements are very expensive and will impact decisions on what the institution will do in regard to disposition of an individual asset and how it impacts their overall portfolio.
In the event the REO is owned through a securitized portfolio, the special servicer is limited in their actions based on the pooling and servicing agreement the terms of which do vary from securitization to securitization.
If there is PMI insurance, the owner of the REO may not maximize the sale of the asset but rather sell sooner at a lower price since a portion or all of the "loss" may be insured resulting in minimal or no loss to the holder of the REO. A property in which funds were advanced for repairs/upgrades, etc will often be market longer to maximize the sale price rather than for a quick sale. These decisions are based on the outstanding balance/investment amount of the asset. If the property is part of a portfolio that was sold to an investment group, you have no idea what their basis is in that property or the overall portfolio.
Despite your perceived notions of a "typical transaction" when it comes to REO properties you really don't know what "Typical Motivations" are with out significant further research if you can even get sufficient information to properly evaluate the true conditions of sale. The true "decision maker" is often not the party listed on the deed. More often than not the party listed on the deed will be the servicer, but there can and usually will be several levels of decision makers involved in the process.
Would it be accurate to say that, although the REO sales may not represent a market transaction and therefore are not direct indicators of market value, their influence in that market has adversely impacted market transactions to the point where a prudent buyer would not pay more for non-REO offering than they would for an REO offering?
I am not saying that REO transactions are not part of the analysis, but just like a homeowner going through a Refi is not necessarily looking to sell, not all buyers want to deal with the many issues involved in purchasing REOs, even at a lower price. REO transaction are often made without any reps or warrantees, no seller disclosures, and sometimes long transaction timelines and delay from contract to close.
There are just more influences affecting REO transactions than most residential appraisers realize. What I am advocating is for those choosing to perform valuation assignments in markets where REO properties are predominant, is to gain a greater understanding of the transactions they choose to rely upon.
As noted by the OP, in their market, the REO transactions sold for cash or sold much quicker than the typical 3-6 months. These reflect condition of sale issues that will need to be accounted for in the analysis.