Danny,
Thanks for continuing to post here, I really appreciate it. :new_smile-l:
I agree with Danny on many points, but it still has to do with how certain one is with the data they're using.
For example, In Union County, North Carolina, the tax card for the most part is correct, except for the square footage. This County is notorious for incorrect square footage. I'm appraising a home right now that is a two year old home and the tax card has it at 2,866 sq.ft., and I measured it at 3,755 sq.ft., go figure. So in Union County, I would hesitate doing a drive-by using the 2055, if I could not verify the square footage in some way. I can sometimes verify the square footage by the on-line permit records. I think one could create a misleading report, or could be accused of being negligent in some way, if one did not verify the square footage in some way, MLS, plans, etc.
In the neighboring County of Mecklenburg, North Carolina, tax records are pretty dead on, and reliable. Most of the time I have no problem using the 2055 form in this County.
I think it boils down to knowing your market, and knowing how reliable your data basis are. And of course this: (per-printed mumbo-jumbo, yadee,yadee,yadha)
(4) research, verify, and analyze data from reliable public and/or private sources, and (5) report his or her analysis, opinions, and conclusions in this appraisal report.
The appraiser must be able to obtain adequate information about the physical characteristics (including, but not limited to, condition, room count, gross living area, etc.) of the subject property from the exterior-only inspection and reliable public and/or private sources to perform this appraisal. The appraiser should use the same type of data sources that he or she uses for comparable sales such as, but not limited to, multiple listing services, tax and assessment records, prior inspections, appraisal files, information provided by the property owner, etc.