• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

Stable Market

The FED can not even figure out the effect of inflation, let alone appraisers. Why go there - just stick to the basics - it is easy to run regression, charts or graphs or simply grid some comps and then check the most recent listings and spending. It will show either prices are going up ( or down) or they are stable. THE END.
 
Different interpretation of market by appraisers.
If no increase and stable, stable?
If increase keeping pace with inflation, stable?
If same continue increase in prices, stable?
 
Different interpretation of market by appraisers.
If no increase and stable, stable?
If increase keeping pace with inflation, stable?
If same continue increase in prices, stable?
Stop trying to measure RE sale prices trends against inflation!! Some appraisers like to complicate things to make themselves appear knowledgeable, or more important than our rather inslated status implies. Appraisers can barely do their own jobs, let alone take on the job of the FED and financial experts who can barely range inflation and what it means in any cycle.

RE prices usually react to supply and demand and interest rates. Of course, the general economy or a local economy can affect prices as well, but that should be reflected in the prices and easy to comment on, vs complex formulas involving inflation.
 
The FED can not even figure out the effect of inflation, let alone appraisers. Why go there - just stick to the basics - it is easy to run regression, charts or graphs or simply grid some comps and then check the most recent listings and spending. It will show either prices are going up ( or down) or they are stable. THE END.
Something about the stark transparency of the correlation is interesting maybe because i never even thought about that comparison. OTOH everytime I determine the 1004MC checkboxes I wonder how peers would categorize thw data, e.g., are doubled valuues during the past 6 months increasing, or stable if the current 3 months are Identical to the 6-9 month values? Is exposure that increased by 700%, from 4 to 28 DOM, actually significant if 28 is near historical low exposure? [[Unsure whether new format will eliminate that type of subjective, relatively arbitrary decisions, or if so, whether thats goodnor bad!!! ]]
 
If the average home appreciation in a market has been is 3%-5% annually for an extended period of time and current market trend analysis shows a 3.8% increase year over year would you mark as stable or increasing? or different scenario - let's say the average appreciation for market was 6%-7% for extended period of time and current analysis shows 3.8% would you mark declining due to it being under the long term average? I am probably over thinking but peer opinions are welcomed.
What I can’t determine from your post is what is the market doing now? Is it still increasing at that rate or did it slow down to stable? If it is the later, then mark it as stable and talk about what you just said in your comments. If it is still increasing, mark it as such.

Not over thinking. You are being a good appraiser!
 
Stop trying to measure RE sale prices trends against inflation!! Some appraisers like to complicate things to make themselves appear knowledgeable, or more important than our rather inslated status implies. Appraisers can barely do their own jobs, let alone take on the job of the FED and financial experts who can barely range inflation and what it means in any cycle.

RE prices usually react to supply and demand and interest rates. Of course, the general economy or a local economy can affect prices as well, but that should be reflected in the prices and easy to comment on, vs complex formulas involving inflation.
J..G., I always respect ur opinion and appreciate ur involvement... but perhaps you are criticizing the potential value of this type of analysis just because you're not accustomed to it. Possible?
 
J..G., I always respect ur opinion and appreciate ur involvement... but perhaps you are criticizing the potential value of this type of analysis just because you're not accustomed to it. Possible?
I think it is beyond the appraiser's SOW or purpose to be measuring property values ( prices in raw data ) relative to inflation. I at least do not pretend to have that level of expertise. We are evaluating prices, hard stop - are they rising, declining, or stable ? Trying to tie it to an inflation rate can be misleading IMO and inadvertently lead to an incorrect result. Espeically as any review is going to stick to what the RE property prices are doing, which was the question asked.
 
Last edited:
True it does say "property values" on the form, so this should be correct, of course the powers that be don't care about correct, they care about conformity.
Why would that be correct? If values increased at the same rate as inflation, then the values still increased, no?
 
What is the line between stable and increasing in your opinion?
Is it 1%, 2%, 3%? What is it?
Well, i have learned how different a linear time adjustment can be from a non linear time adjustment, the micro can be different from macro time. Oh, i love the fluctuating monthly/quarterly with both increasing and decreasing time lines.

Anything less the 1,2 maybe 3%, i would say stable and make no adjustments. But if you have plus time adjustments, or neg time adjustment on most of your comps you go that direction.
1750078681731.png
 
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top