• Welcome to AppraisersForum.com, the premier online  community for the discussion of real estate appraisal. Register a free account to be able to post and unlock additional forums and features.

StreetLinks - New Limited Desk Review Product

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tony Ebeyer

Junior Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2005
Professional Status
General Public
State
Indiana
StreetLinks has launched a new appraisal desk review product designed to replace AVMs used in underwriting.

As you might be aware, an increasing number of lenders are resorting to the use of inferior products and techniques to review the work of professional appraisers. It has become routine to ask the experienced local appraiser, who has specific geo-competency and has actually visited the subject property and surrounding neighborhood, to validate their valuation against the conclusions of a desk review performed by a non-local market reviewer (who rarely has MLS access), or worse, an AVM. It is StreetLinks’ position that only an experienced, geo-competent appraiser with access to current market data can appropriately analyze qualitative aspects of the subject and comparable pool and subsequently apply the Principle of Substitution for final comp selection.

Unfortunately, AVMs and other inferior review products are often utilized by lenders because they are far less expensive and can be obtained in a more timely fashion than traditional appraisal review products completed by a local market appraiser.

In order to combat the proliferation of these flawed products, StreetLinks has developed two limited-scope desk review products designed to keep reviews in the hands of skilled and experienced local-market appraisers. SCORe (StreetLinks Comparable Opinion Report) will provide a second opinion regarding the appropriateness of the original appraiser’s comparable selection provided by a local, geo-competent appraiser that has access to all of the same public and private data sources that were utilized to develop the original report. SCORe-Plus extends the SCORe scope to include the appraiser’s evaluation of the appropriateness of up to five additional “comps” provided by the lender (usually generated by an AVM). In other words, SCORe and SCORe-Plus allow appraisers (rather than inferior alternative products/methods) to provide the answer to the question most asked by lenders when underwriting an appraisal report: Were the best comps used? Due to the highly restricted scope of work, SCORe products will be competitive with inferior review products in terms of price and timing, while providing a much more credible analysis.

USPAP provides for flexibility in determining the scope of work for an appraisal review assignment in order to provide the lender/client the exact supplemental information needed to adequately reconcile the collateral valuation piece of the loan file. Per USPAP Standard 3-1(b), “The subject of an appraisal review assignment may be all or a part of a report, a workfile, or a combination of these”. The scope of SCORe is limited to the evaluation of the original appraiser’s comparable selection. SCORe-Plus includes the evaluation of up to five additional properties. The assignment will be based on the extraordinary assumption that the subject property’s amenities and condition are accurately described in the original appraisal. The assignment will NOT require the reviewer to analyze adjustments made to the comparables or develop an opinion of value.

SCORe will soon be available in WinTotal, ClickForms, and ACI report writing software packages, and a PDF form will be available for users of other platforms. A sample of the SCORe/SCORe-Plus form is attached for you to review the Scope of Work, Assumptions, and Limiting Conditions. Appraisers with questions may call 1-888-761-2209 to speak with Mike Floyd, StreetLinks’ Chief Corporate Appraiser.

StreetLinks’ initial testing indicates that this assignment will take between 20-30 minutes depending on the availability of comparable information in different markets. After examining the report, scope, assumptions, and limiting conditions, appraisers who wish to do so may inform StreetLinks of the fee that they will charge to provide this product.

Tony Ebeyer, COO
StreetLinks National Appraisal Services
 

Attachments

:angry:

Stop with the cute product names and hokey software add-ons. How much are you paying for appraisal review assignments?
 
Your choice

:angry:

Stop with the cute product names and hokey software add-ons. How much are you paying for appraisal review assignments?

"...After examining the report, scope, assumptions, and limiting conditions, appraisers who wish to do so may inform StreetLinks of the fee that they will charge to provide this product."

As always, appraisers set their fee with StreetLinks.
 
Tony, I hope your review appraisals will be done by competent appraisers, unlike those LARA appraisers.
The only LARA review I have ever encountered was for an appraisal done for SL. And it was done by a Landsafe appraiser who had no clue of the Brooklyn market.
 
As always, appraisers set their fee with StreetLinks.

All appraisers are equal. It's just that some are more equal than others.


It has become routine to ask the experienced local appraiser, who has specific geo-competency and has actually visited the subject property and surrounding neighborhood,

StreetLinks has developed two limited-scope desk review products

So you've developed a no-inspect review "product" to police the "did inspect" review product used to review "no inspect" review product designed to review a "did inspect" appraisal product.

You guys are just nuts. New products cooked up in a conference room as a way to compete with other AMCs. Where's the barf emoticon?
 
So you've developed a no-inspect review "product" to police the "did inspect" review product used to review "no inspect" review product designed to review a "did inspect" appraisal product.

Greg, this product is already offered out there to lenders and other clients. Most other AMC's offering this product, are done by incompetent appraisers. So if Tony can deliver the same product by local competent appraisers, then he should go for it. If SL wont do it, there is a good chance it will be done by some other inferior AMC, who does not give a damn about competency.
 
Last edited:
Exactly

Tony, I hope your review appraisals will be done by competent appraisers, unlike those LARA appraisers.
The only LARA review I have ever encountered was for an appraisal done for SL. And it was done by a Landsafe appraiser who had no clue of the Brooklyn market.

Eli,

It's situations like that - and specifically the product that you mentioned - that were our motivation to create this product. The SCORe is performed by a local appraiser with geo-competency and access to all local data sources.
 
The world needs fewer products and more assignments. The Fannie 2000 form is bad enough and now we're having to wallow through all of these "products."
 
Specific Purpose

New products cooked up in a conference room as a way to compete with other AMCs.

The product was actually conceived after observations and conversations with underwriting managers who explained that they obtain AVMs to assess if other "comps" might have been more appropriately used by the appraiser.

The SCORe simply allows the lender to obtain a second, PROFESSIONAL opinion of the appropriateness of the comps used by the original appraiser - exactly the purpose for which they were trying to use an AVM.
 
So you think spending 20 or 30 minutes with a property appraisal (and I presume the fee is likely capped at not more than $150) is sufficient due diligence to understand the property rights, improvements, market conditions, highest and best use, cost and income analysis, etc, etc.?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Find a Real Estate Appraiser - Enter Zip Code

Copyright © 2000-, AppraisersForum.com, All Rights Reserved
AppraisersForum.com is proudly hosted by the folks at
AppraiserSites.com
Back
Top