J Grant
Elite Member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2003
- Professional Status
- Certified Residential Appraiser
- State
- Florida
I think JG has an interesting point. Lets say a house easily worth $200K goes under contract for $150K due to ignorance of the seller. What is the value of the property prior to closing? The buyer has the OPTION and potential obligation to purchase the house for $150K. To the current owner, their CURRENT bundle of rights is definitely affected by this contract/option. It is similar to a leased fee interest in some respects. They cannot simply 'change their mind' and sell it for $200K, which may be the true 'market value'. Market value is not changing, but the value of the bundle of rights does change immediately before and after the sale closing. So it depends on what value we are providing, to whom, etc.
To the OP's question, does any part of the current valuation depend on these 3 contracts post-zoning/usage change? I would say 'market value' does not depend on these contracts, just like market value would not necessarily change with or without the sales contract in my example above.
What MIGHT affect market value (assuming that is the value you are determining) is of course the zoning/usage change, if it allows multiple lots where only one was allowed before. For that reason, I think a HC would be the way to go here, so long as you think that will be the actual outcome. Because IF the zoning change occurs, BUT all the contracts still go away, the market value will still have increased, yes?
You are correct in that the value of a property does not change because it has a sales contract of X when the property is worth a value of Y. Prices are facts, market value is an opinion. BUT for appraisal purpose, MV definition states a well informed buyer and seller. In your example, a seller taking 150k offer on a property worth 200k is not a well informed/well advised seller. He is allowed of course to be an idiot and take less $ for his property. But if the property were being appraised, its MV would be 200k, not 150k.