LOL - I asked that no one answer for Danny! But, I am glad you did. Yes, it was obtuse, that was the point. No, it did not include appropriate context, again the point. Never said anyone owed me anything and I don't expect my respect means diddly to DW. I would not say he has been inconsistent in his responses ever, rather I would say they have been consistently horesh*t. I have called Danny out for not answering my questions this last time, after asking other questions multiple times and receiving no appropriate response there either, except for the out-of-context, or the pick-only-part-of-it, or the totally missed-the-point and answered like a politician. Not only did he do that to me on this thread, he has done that others on this thread. In addition, he has accused appraisers of essentially being delusional (saying our problems are only perceived), that the real problem with appraisers not making money is time management, that appraisers don't understand market context and last but not least, which was why I phrased the final question the way I did, is that AMC fees paid are market value, with zero acknowledgement that they are not market value in the traditional sense (shall we say fair market?). It was not just me he made these ridiculous comments to, but many on this thread who did not deserve it for the points they had made. Go back and read the thread if you think I have summed up the conversation inaccurately.
Like I said, you answered for Danny and you answered correctly - the answer to the question is a lack of context, which in my opinion is what Danny exhibits and I find it insulting. I make no apologies. I aint the best and brightest, but I can smell BS just the same. All I ever wanted in this thread is for DW own who and what he is - part of the ugly side of the business. Instead he comes on here and tries to sugar-coat our plight and place the blame on us. F that.
