Someone with a “B.Sc. Weather Policy” (no, really) tells us: “AI-powered climate models leverage sophisticated algorithms and machine learning to process extensive climate-related datasets. By simulating various climate scenarios, these models help scientists understand potential future...
climatediscussionnexus.com
Talk about having your apocalypse and sleeping in too. And about babbling. Does anyone, including him, seriously think every tenth of a degree matters? If we grant the implausible claim that they know the temperature in 1850 to a tenth of a degree worldwide, can they tell us at what point it had risen by a tenth of a degree and what measurable changes resulted? Even positive ones?
Go on. We’ll wait. Was it 1873? 1888? What changes affected human well-being, extinctions, weather patterns or the price of tea in China? Oh, and why did this warming happen, given the minimal human production of CO2 at that point? Put that in your computer and calculate it.
We also want to know what else is as dead as a doornail now that we’ve passed 1.5°C, blown through it or whatever metaphor seems most excitable. And sure enough, the Maldives are in deep if not yet in Davy Jones’ locker.
And we say it advisedly. Because even if humans could somehow remove “all the extra CO2 we’re going to add after passing 1.5°C” it wouldn’t get temperatures back down to cool, balmy, safe 2024 given that alarmists typically say there’s a built-in momentum due to the CO2 we already released. Nor do they typically praise 2024, instead saying stuff like that humanity has opened the gates of hell. Surely we should close them again.
Except if we do, where are we going back to? Was 1850 ideal? How do you know? What was wrong with 1625? (Climatologically we mean; the history’s another story.) Why not 903 AD, or 757 BC? If you’re going to play God, think big.
That's the stupidity of it. It's been much warmer in the past and the polar bears survived, humanity survived (even thrived compared to the "dark ages" when it was cooler.) CO2 is plant food. Period. And warming cannot be attributed solely to "human activity", if fact, only a tiny fraction much less that 10% is attributable to humans. 
www.thegatewaypundit.com
