This Won't end Well for Germany

[Mike Ault]

If you want to take care of the third world I encourage you to donate to the cause but that viewpoint is unacceptable to about 70% of the country if not more and I'll side with the people that suffer from the unregulated flow of whomever with whatever on a daily basis and the 'Wall' as you refer to it did have several doors in it if memory serves, and it was remarkably calm compared to the current state under the care of the progressive globalists. Hilary is a pathetic grifter/leach on the political system, saying 'lock her up' was an apt commentary on her past and contemporary conduct and just spirited political rhetoric protected by the constitution.

Here's what the people most affected by the situation on the border actually thought about your wall in 2019 – (+70% PFA)

Executive Summary 2 To better understand the attitudes and preferences that border residents have on border policies, the U.S. Immigration Policy Center (USIPC) at UC San Diego surveyed 2,750 voters across the four southwestern border states—Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Texas. The survey was fielded from October 8 to October 22. The margin of error is +/- 2.1%. For more, see methodology section. The data show that the majority of registered voters across the four southwestern border states—Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Texas—disapprove of the way that the president is handling issues at the U.S.-Mexico border. The results also reveal a general lack of trust in the Border Patrol agency, which includes: lack of trust that Border Patrol officials will protect the rights and civil liberties of all people; lack of trust that Border Patrol officials will keep border residents safe; and lack of trust that Border Patrol officials who abuse their authority will be held accountable for their abuses. Moreover, registered voters in the southwestern border states generally prefer policies opposite to those of the current administration. These policies include: alternatives to detention for families seeking refuge in the U.S.; placing unaccompanied minors caught attempting to cross the border illegally into the care of child welfare specialists, not border or immigration enforcement officials; providing aid to migrants in distress (e.g., food and water) rather than criminally prosecuting those who provide aid to migrants in distress; investing more in making ports of entry more efficient rather than spending more on border security; and admitting asylum seekers into the U.S. in order to ensure their safety rather than making asylum seekers wait in Mexico. When it comes to spending, whereas the majority of registered voters across the four southwestern border states oppose additional federal spending on border walls and fencing, the results are mixed when it comes to additional federal spending on hiring more Border Patrol agents. Lastly, the results show that just over 3 out of 10 have been stopped and questioned about their citizenship status at an interior border checkpoint.

https://usipc.ucsd.edu/publications/usipc-border-poll-final.pdf

 

[Dublin ohio]

Here's what the people most affected by the situation on the border actually thought about your wall in 2019 – (+70% PFA)

Executive Summary 2 To better understand the attitudes and preferences that border residents have on border policies, the U.S. Immigration Policy Center (USIPC) at UC San Diego surveyed 2,750 voters across the four southwestern border states—Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Texas. The survey was fielded from October 8 to October 22. The margin of error is +/- 2.1%. For more, see methodology section. The data show that the majority of registered voters across the four southwestern border states—Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Texas—disapprove of the way that the president is handling issues at the U.S.-Mexico border. The results also reveal a general lack of trust in the Border Patrol agency, which includes: lack of trust that Border Patrol officials will protect the rights and civil liberties of all people; lack of trust that Border Patrol officials will keep border residents safe; and lack of trust that Border Patrol officials who abuse their authority will be held accountable for their abuses. Moreover, registered voters in the southwestern border states generally prefer policies opposite to those of the current administration. These policies include: alternatives to detention for families seeking refuge in the U.S.; placing unaccompanied minors caught attempting to cross the border illegally into the care of child welfare specialists, not border or immigration enforcement officials; providing aid to migrants in distress (e.g., food and water) rather than criminally prosecuting those who provide aid to migrants in distress; investing more in making ports of entry more efficient rather than spending more on border security; and admitting asylum seekers into the U.S. in order to ensure their safety rather than making asylum seekers wait in Mexico. When it comes to spending, whereas the majority of registered voters across the four southwestern border states oppose additional federal spending on border walls and fencing, the results are mixed when it comes to additional federal spending on hiring more Border Patrol agents. Lastly, the results show that just over 3 out of 10 have been stopped and questioned about their citizenship status at an interior border checkpoint.

https://usipc.ucsd.edu/publications/usipc-border-poll-final.pdf

Did you even read the study. The questions they used are all "loaded". Worded in a way to elicit a preferred answer.

 

[Charles West]

Here's what the people most affected by the situation on the border actually thought about your wall in 2019 – (+70% PFA)

Executive Summary 2 To better understand the attitudes and preferences that border residents have on border policies, the U.S. Immigration Policy Center (USIPC) at UC San Diego surveyed 2,750 voters across the four southwestern border states—Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Texas. The survey was fielded from October 8 to October 22. The margin of error is +/- 2.1%. For more, see methodology section. The data show that the majority of registered voters across the four southwestern border states—Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Texas—disapprove of the way that the president is handling issues at the U.S.-Mexico border. The results also reveal a general lack of trust in the Border Patrol agency, which includes: lack of trust that Border Patrol officials will protect the rights and civil liberties of all people; lack of trust that Border Patrol officials will keep border residents safe; and lack of trust that Border Patrol officials who abuse their authority will be held accountable for their abuses. Moreover, registered voters in the southwestern border states generally prefer policies opposite to those of the current administration. These policies include: alternatives to detention for families seeking refuge in the U.S.; placing unaccompanied minors caught attempting to cross the border illegally into the care of child welfare specialists, not border or immigration enforcement officials; providing aid to migrants in distress (e.g., food and water) rather than criminally prosecuting those who provide aid to migrants in distress; investing more in making ports of entry more efficient rather than spending more on border security; and admitting asylum seekers into the U.S. in order to ensure their safety rather than making asylum seekers wait in Mexico. When it comes to spending, whereas the majority of registered voters across the four southwestern border states oppose additional federal spending on border walls and fencing, the results are mixed when it comes to additional federal spending on hiring more Border Patrol agents. Lastly, the results show that just over 3 out of 10 have been stopped and questioned about their citizenship status at an interior border checkpoint.

https://usipc.ucsd.edu/publications/usipc-border-poll-final.pdf

Hindsight is a wonderful thing but unfortunately it's a luxury nobody can afford, I'll stick with contemporary private polling.

 

[Mike Ault]

Did you even read the study. The questions they used are all "loaded". Worded in a way to elicit a preferred answer.

At least I quoted something. After you review appraisals for a couple of decades it's easy to spot a PFA statistic like he quoted. I did make one mistake with that prior post however, I shouldn't have left him that "Hillary" opening. she's not a great deal more defensible than Trump. Still smarting over the "backhand" he gave me there…

 

[Mike Ault]

BOB! Why are you liking all of those posts? Once they get done with me they will come for the Quakers as well! No way you will be able to "live side-by-side in righteous modernity" with them, you have a better shot with my folks as they are considerably more tolerant…

 

[George Hatch]

Nah, it's just the godless socialists that we intend to resist. We will not be cancelled.

 

[Mike Ault]

We will not be cancelled.

Just "Rated X" for extremists…

 

[George Hatch]

By the time it amounts to 80% of everyone it's not extreme.

Fortunately, we don't need people to shut up, so you're in no danger of getting cancelled. You just need to get off our lawn and stay in your own yard.

 

[Mike Ault]

Wisconsin Is Ground Zero for the MAGA Effort to Steal the Next Election

How Wisconsin became ground zero for Donald Trump and the radical right’s plot to steal the next election.

www.rollingstone.com

 

[glenn walker]

I will c;ue you in as

And about building a shiny steel wall against our neighbors to the south, describing them as drug dealers, murderers and rapists. The "wall" along with "lock her up" got the greatest applause lines from the MAGA rabble. Not a "sinister" point of view however it was exceedingly "low class" and designed not to inform but to inflame public opinion.

Biden is building the wall as we are speaking but the Woke Holes now call it a Rail --Also as of last week we had apprehended just under 2,000,000 people now thats an invasion not immigration. What I cannot understand with Woke Holes is simple math and logic should out weigh some ideology as Our current school system systems-hospitals -social services are at breaking point right now with no more people. We also have no shortage of unskilled labor . It took hundreds of-years in some cases for a large city to get to 1 million people while at our current pace we could build a new one million person city every 12 ,months if we let everyone in. There is simply no logic to open borders with South America as they have nothing to offers but to drag us into eventionally being just like them a poor third world nation.

Thses Democrat Politicians are the most pathetic lyers as they never live with immigrants -The poor or blacks. Even their Black Politicians like Aunt Maxiccne lives in a Guard Gated Mansion outside the district she misrepresents. Th same goes with exchange students screw them we dont need them either. I would have no problem making Mexico a Sanctuary State where banished and exiled Woke Holes could be sent to spend their remaining years on dirt roads and live in the El Diablo Mexican version of my Dead Hooker Motel in downtown Tijuana.